Occupying Hell

Cartoon found at ConservativeBytes.com 10/23/2011

A Backhanded ‘Tribute’ OBL on 9/11/11

Hat tip goes to NewsBusters.com where I first saw this timely ‘tribute’ to Osama Bin Laden. This is a flashback of the ‘Bastard in the Sand’ parody sung by Martin Short accompanied by the ‘Singing Navy SEALS.’ Some of the lyrics follow the video.

Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2011/09/10/flashback-bastard-sand-parody-sung-martin-short-accompanied-singing-nav#ixzz1XhHNKcS2

"BASTARD IN THE SAND"

"Goodbye, Al Qaeda's Rose
Your beard never seemed too clean to me
So I'm glad they washed you off
Before they dumped you in the sea.

In the afterlife
Six dozen virgins sure sounded swell
So it must've burned your ass
When you ended up in hell.

It seems to me you lived your life
Like a bastard in the sand
Never knowing when the U.S. Navy SEALs would land
They caught you by surprise inside your secret base
Could've shot you anywhere
But why not in the face?

Goodbye, Al Qaeda’s Rose
To the world you were mad
And to your kids and 22 wives
You were also a deadbeat dad.

Multi-million dollar bounty
Placed on your head
You were wanted 'dead or alive'
But in the end we went with 'dead'."

Obama Will Get No Hat Tip From Me

Why did Obama "do right thing" and get Osama?  Well, first of all Obama is obviously a puppet of the New World Order and the corporations which contributed to his campaign.  His orders may as well have come off of a teleprompter.  Secondly, it wasn't Obama who got him, it was the Navy Seals.  And finally, I don't even know if all of this is real or not.  I am not entirely convinced that Osama didn't die a long time ago, or isn't somehow still alive even.  I have no real reason to believe the news media, the pentagon, and certainly not the White House.  So whether the New World Order had some reason for taking out Osama or whether they had some reason to make people think that he died, I don't know.  But it does seem to make people forget about Libya, and this could boost Obama in the polls.  But the Bible says,

And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 (KJV)

Late Night Takes: Will Gadhafi be next to join Saddam & Osama?

Late Night Humor

The Tonight Show With Jay Leno

·     President Obama has done something that no one else has been able to do. He got Donald Trump to shut up.

·     Saddam Hussein is dead, and Osama bin Laden is dead. If you’re Moammar Gadhafi, living in exile is starting to sound really good.

·     NATO bombed Gadhafi’s compound in Tripoli. The bombing damaged countless antique rugs and curtains, leaving Gadhafi with absolutely nothing to wear.

Late Night With Jimmy Fallon

·     Rush Limbaugh said yesterday that Obama never would have tracked down bin Laden if it weren’t for George W. Bush’s policies. Although in fairness, Obama never would have even been elected if it weren’t for George W. Bush’s policies.

These jokes are courtesy of NewsMax.com (Hat Tip!), which periodically sends out an email compilation of late night jokes, few of which are worth repeating … however, these were the exceptions in the batch I received today.

Late Night Takes: Let Bygones be Bin Laden

Late Night Humor

The Tonight Show With Jay Leno

·     The good news: Osama bin Laden is dead. The bad news: there is no bad news.

·     For their honeymoon, the royal couple wants to go somewhere they can have complete privacy and no one in the country will give away their location. I think they’re going to Pakistan.

Jimmy Kimmel Live!

·     I would like us to kill bin Laden every Sunday night. It makes for a much brighter start to the week.

·     After all the talk about caves, bin Laden was hiding in a million-dollar mansion in Pakistan. The CIA became suspicious when they learned there was a million-dollar mansion in Pakistan.

·     I just want to point out that “buried at sea” means “dumped in the ocean.” This could be the best Shark Week ever.

These jokes are courtesy of NewsMax.com (Hat Tip!), which periodically sends out an email compilation of late night jokes, few of which are worth repeating … however, these were the exceptions in the batch I received today.

Bad O-Man, Gone For Good ...

“Welcome to hell, (Osama) bin Laden!” 

--- Governor Mike Huckabee, as quoted in the Huffington Post  today

Hat tip goes to Judson Phillips of the TeaPartyNation.com, who wrote an article, “A great day for America, not for Obama.” The article reads, in part:

“Osama is dead.  Americans have a right to celebrate that.  It is a great day for America.  We owe a special debt of gratitude to our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines who made this day possible. 

“We owe Obama, nothing. 

“To paraphrase something Sarah Palin said recently, it is not hard to be courageous when you have no other choice.   

“Obama had no other choice…” 

Read more here.

I might disagree slightly with Mr. Phillips in that for whatever reason the President did make the right decision to go ahead with the attack on Osama’s compound. This President has done so little right, that at least in this matter he did the right thing and should at be acknowledged as such.

Now might be a good time to get out of Afghanistan, Iraq & Libya, too. 

Reaching out to Islam

Cartoon by Dana Summers as found on Townhall.com 6/8/09

Where is Osama?

“Pakistani intelligence believes that Osama bin Laden is dead, but acknowledged that they have no evidence.

“Darn, just when (Soetoro alias) Obama was getting ready to apologize to him.”

- - NewsBusted, Episode 5/08/09


NewsBusted is a conservative comedy webcast about the news of the day, uploaded every Tuesday and every Friday. Their newest NewBusted episode includes the excerpt above.

Time Magazine Desecrates WWII Icon

NewsBusters is a conservative news and comedy website. Their newest NewBusted episode includes the excerpt below. See right panel of this blog and click on the video to watch this 2-3 minute comedy YouTube video.

“Time Magazine is under fire for a cover photo showing the Marines at Iwo Jima planting a tree to fight “Global Warming.”

“If that is all it takes for liberal journalists to support a war, then I hear Osama Bin Laden doesn’t like to recycle!”


- - - NewsBusted, Episode 161

Why Christians Should be Against the War in Iraq

by Matt Miller

The President has given many reasons for going to war with Iraq, but none of them are Biblically or constitutionally valid. Some people have said that we have good reasons to continue to occupy Iraq, but these aren’t Biblically or constitutionally valid either. The war in Iraq in unconstitutional because no official declaration of war was ever made (only an authorization for “the use of force”).

1. There was some talk in the beginning about connections between Sadaam Hussein and Al Qaeda. The 9/11 Commission made the determination that this is not the case. Colon Powell admitted that this was not the case. Even the President has abandoned this claim. Iraq has never participated in any terrorist attack against the United States.

2. Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Should every nation that has WMD be violently overthrown? Is this a Biblical or constitutional mandate?

3. Iraq violated U.N. resolutions. But the corrupt and hypocritical U.N. violates its own resolutions all the time (e.g. the oil for food program). Let their “peacekeeping forces” be the ones to enforce their rules at the expense of their citizens. The United States should have gotten out of this wicked organization a long time ago. The American people should decide what America does, not some conglomeration of nations.

4. There is the idea that the war in Iraq makes the U.S. safer. A GOP slogan was, “If we don’t fight them over there then we will have to fight them over here.” Is that a Christian thing to say? Does only the fear that a nation will attack the U.S. justify a preemptive attack? That sounds like the same justification that a terrorist would use to attack the U.S. The Bible teaches that we should not rely on military might for our protection, but the Lord (Psalm 118:8, 9, Ephesians 6:12). This not to say that we should never bring lawbreakers to justice (because the Bible authorizes and even commands this), but military force should only be used against those who have violated U.S. laws.

5. There is the idea that it was good to bring down Sadaam Hussein because he was a brutal dictator who killed his own people. I reject the idea that U.S. should be the policeman of the world. I find in Scripture no Biblical mandate for this. This is a matter that, as far as military force goes, should be left up to God and the Iraqi people. How bad does a nation have to get before it becomes justifiable to attack it? What Sadaam Hussein has done is a drop in the bucket compared to what we are doing in the U.S., which is brutally murdering 3500 innocent unborn babies per day. Would you advocate a violent overthrow our government because of this? We should remove the planks from our own eyes first.

6. There is the idea that a democracy would bring stability to the region. Does the U.S. have a mandate from God in the Scriptures to take down governments and set up democracies? Our nation was founded on Christian principles by Christians. We are a strong nation because God gave the Founding Fathers the wisdom to establish our Republic (it is not actually a democracy). We are losing our strength because we have turned our backs on God. Do you really think that this “democracy” will work in a nation which is mostly Muslim and contains three warring factions? The Bible says that there is no hope for Babylon. Jeremiah 51:9 says, “We would have healed Babylon, but she is not healed: forsake her, and let us go every one into his own country: for her judgment reacheth up to heaven, and is lifted up even to the skies.”

7. There is the idea that it is unpatriotic or disrespectful to say things against the people who are fighting in Iraq for our freedom to dissent. Being against the war in Iraq is in no way disrespecting the people who are fighting in Iraq and trying to make the best of a bad situation. People fighting in Iraq are not giving us the freedom to dissent, but Almighty God is. It is true that there are times in which the sacrifice of lives is necessary for freedom, but that doesn’t mean that all wars that America has engaged in were justified or helped the cause of freedom. I have relatives and friends in the military who are in Iraq and I don’t want them to die in vain. Is that wish unpatriotic or disrespectful in any way? The distraction of Iraq has left us powerless to accomplish the real patriotic mission which is to capture Osama Bin Laden and the top Al Qaeda leaders. Being against the war in Iraq does not disrespect the families of those who died on September 11th. Dividing our forces and not going all out with all our military might to capture Osama Bin Laden is what has denied justice to them. God has allowed our government to make foolish choices because we have turned our backs on Him.

8. There is the idea that we should be for the war in Iraq because the Democrats and the news media are against it or because Republicans are for it. These are ridiculous arguments. Each person should think for himself. If the Democrats were really steadfastly against the war, they could have withdrawn funding for it and it would be over. But instead they have attempted to bargain with the Bush administration about this to get the goodies that they want, while fooling their anti-war constituency into thinking that they are really doing something to stop it.

The Bible specifically warns God’s people to stay away from Babylon. There are evil spirits there. The reason given for one to stay away is so that one does not share in its sins (Revelation 18:4).

Ron Paul is, as of now, the only Presidential candidate who is both pro-life and against the war in Iraq. He is really pro-life, not one these “exceptions in cases of …” candidates. He is not some pot-smoking, pacifist hippie, either. Congressman Paul voted in favor of military action in Afghanistan for the purposes of capturing Osama Bin Laden. Ron Paul is running on the Republican ballot.

If you agree with him, join the revolution!

Newest NewsBusted: Is NBC Blind to Evil?

NewsBusters is a conservative news and comedy website. Here is just one of their bits from their current episode. See right panel of this blog and click on the video to watch this 2-3 minute comedy YouTube.com video.

“On a recent Today Show, NBC News correspondent Ned Colt ran a segment entitled, “Osama Bin Laden: Fanatic or Hero?” We here at Newsbusters have been producing our won TV program, it’s called, “NBC News: Traitors or Just Really Really Blind to Evil?”

- - - NewsBusted, Episode 135

Mike Huckabee on Meet the Press, part 2

Last week, in part 1, I talked about the Huckster’s compromising position on abortion.

I actually agreed with some other things Friar Huck said in that interview. He said that he would be in favor of using military force in Pakistan to capture or kill Osama Bin Laden. He said that he would try not to turn it into a war with whole nation of Pakistan. I think it is refreshing to hear a candidate say something like this with all the hateful rhetoric out there. I want the President to be someone who will pursue justice while minimizing the loss of innocent life, and avoid overthrowing governments and costly nation building.

However, Huckaberry Fin still believes in this war in Iraq which has unnecessarily cost thousands of innocent lives.

As I pointed out last week, he talks out of both sides of his mouth on abortion.

Huckabee raised his hand when the question was asked “Who does not believe in evolution?” But later he said that he did not know "how or when God created".

Huckabee has said, “I am a 10th amendment candidate.” But he believes in the “No Child Left Behind” program which oversteps the authority of the federal government and pours money into a system that teaches evolution as fact.

This is all reminiscent of Bush in the 2000 campaign saying that he did not believe in “nation building”.

Bush also said in the 2000 campaign that he was pro-life, but at the same time he said would chose the most qualified judges and not use abortion as a “litmus test”. I believed him, so I didn’t vote for him. He spoke out against taking innocent life for the purpose of saving others (in reference to funding embryonic stem cell research), but yet he believes that abortion should be legal in cases of rape and incest.

Bush also said that he was against gay marriage, but then appointed a homosexual to an office for AIDS policy and got cozy with the Log Cabin Republicans.

We should learn a lesson from all of this.

The main blogger, Gregjaye, pointed out that Huckabee is making some bold statements against homosexuality.

Can we really believe him?

Notice that Friar Huck did not say anything about being against civil unions, anti-discrimination laws based on sexual orientation, and didn’t say that he would never appoint a homosexual to an office.

I heard that Huckabee refused to answer a question about whether Christians were the only ones going to heaven. He is both morally and financially bankrupt.

Why not vote for a man who supports the returning our government to its constitutional roots and comes right out says what he believes without any hypocrisy. (I am speaking of Ron Paul, of course.)

For six, nearly consecutive years, we had a Repuplican President, a Republican Congress, and the majority of the Supreme Court Justices were appointed by Republican Presidents (it was and still is six to three, in fact). And yet abortion remained legal, and the amount of taxpayers' dollars that went into Klanned Parenthood actually increased during that time. More money was spent by the federal government during those six years than all previous administrations combined!

What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him? If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, "Go in peace, be warmed and filled," without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?

James 2:14-16 (ESV)

Please don't elect another Bush clone!

Should the U.S. Fund “Moderate” Terrorism?

The U.S. is engaged in several attempts to arm various groups around the world as they are fighting against extremists and terrorists. But are these groups themselves terrorists?

It is well known that President Bush wants to establish a Palestinian state. The U.S. is giving them $190 million in aid to do this. The U.S. is arming the Palestinian group Fatah as they are fighting against the more radical, but popularly elected Hamas. They have taken over the Gaza Strip, and the Bush wants Fatah to control the West Bank. But will the weapons that we are giving them end up being pointed at the United States? King George wants to “spread democracy”, but only when the elected are to his liking.

The U.S. is now engaged in arming Sunnis in Iraq, even some former Bathists (ones who were loyal to Saddam Hussein). The hope is that they will use these weapons to fight against Al Qaeda. These were the very people who President Bush said were evil and were in cahoots with Al Qaeda and must be overthrown for the safety of the United States. Now he is saying we must help them defeat Al Qaeda. Is this wacky or what? Some of the dollars we are pouring into Iraq are bound to end up in hands of the insurgents.

The U.S. has given aid to Pakistan in order to seek out and kill Al Qaeda members who have crossed the border from Afghanistan. Remember that the justification for overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan was that they refused to hand over Osama Bin Laden. He has not been caught, despite the fact that Pakistani President Musharaf has said, “we have done our part”. Not only has Musharaf been complacent about this, he has made treaties with Taliban factions and has created a “safe zone” (no Pakistani police or military presence) for terrorists in Pakistan along the Afghanistan border. Musharaf will not even allow U.S. forces to come into that region and deliver justice to these murderous terrorists. Remember that President Bush once said, “We will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them.” The case for war against Pakistan is now equal to that of the case for war against Afghanistan and far greater than the case for war in Iraq ever was, and yet President Bush still wants to give Pakistan aid.

The Mujahadeen fighters (which included Osama Bin Laden) that were armed by both the Carter and Reagan administrations against the Soviet Union became the Al Qaeda of today. The establishment of the Taliban government was also funded by the United States under the Clinton administration. Bush claimed that he was against such “nation building” when he first campaigned for president in 2000, but unfortunately, he discarded this promise soon after he was elected.

The other Islamic madman that the world has focused its attention on in is this Mahmoud Amedinajad. (I think that the mullahs have the real power in Iran, but this is moot point—they are all of the same ilk.) I don’t know that the U.S. is funding Iran now, but it did help Iran at one time. Remember the Iran-Contra scandal?

I have only mentioned the funding of Islamic groups in this article only because that’s where everyone’s attention is these days. Don’t think that I don’t know that they have not cornered the market on terrorism. Both republicans and democrats alike have funded and/or aided countless other thugs, dictators, and bloody revolutionaries who were worse than those they overthrew.

Is “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” really a good policy? Have we really learned the lessons of September 11th?

Psalm 118:8, 9 says, “It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man. It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes.”

Psalm 146:3 says, “Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.”

Isaiah 31:1-3 says, “Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because they are many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the LORD! Yet he also is wise, and will bring evil, and will not call back his words: but will arise against the house of the evildoers, and against the help of them that work iniquity. Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When the LORD shall stretch out his hand, both he that helpeth shall fall, and he that is holpen shall fall down, and they shall fail together.”