MURDER, UNINCORPORATED, PART THREE

The Destruction of the U.S.A.

My dad and I used to debate each other about the Democrat Party. He said that they were willfully trying to destroy the United States. I said that they did not know what they were doing. Then while watching Rush Limbaugh on television he showed a short segment of John F. Kennedy’s speech to the New York City Economic Club. I watched as President Kennedy said that the way to increase revenue to the Federal Government was to decrease the income tax rate. On the other hand increasing the tax rate would decrease revenue to the Federal Government. Then I thought, they do know what they are doing. Dad is correct. They are deliberately working to destroy this country through the laws and policies they enact as well as through the people they put into influential places of authority in various agencies and in the judiciary.

Congress follows a budgeting procedure where by the budget is automatically increased by a set percentage every year. If this base percentage increase is reduced then the budget is said to be reduced even though more is actually spent in the budget than in the previous year. The Democrats press Congress to spend more than the United States Treasury receives in income. Then they want to increase taxes which tends to lower revenue to the U.S Treasury. Solomon wrote that “the rich rule over the poor. So also the borrower is servant to the lender” (Proverbs 22:7). This makes for an ever increasing debt which in time will destroy the country.

The Democrats are against companies and individuals earning profits. God’s word says that the Redeemer teaches a person to profit (Isaiah 48:17). The Redeemer of course is Jesus of Nazareth. He is not against profit.

The American dream of those who first came to America was to worship God as they choose. They wanted individual liberty for each and every person. Today the American dream is a job and a place to live. The American people, today, have turned away from honoring the Lord Jesus Christ. Scripture says that the wicked shall be turned into hell and all the nations that forget God. America has trashed God.

In schools children are not allowed to talk about Jesus Christ or bring their Bibles to school. Children are reprimanded for it. Teachers are fired if they talk about Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ and the Bible have been taken out of the text books. Our students are being taught to be fools by being taught not to believe in God. Actually God says, “The fool has said in his heart that there is no God” (Psalm 14:1).

Often, I hear that secular government as the way to govern. Secular means without God which is godlessness, immorality, profane, and without moral restraint.
 
King David said, “The Spirit of the Lord spoke by me, and His word was on my tongue. The God of Israel said, the Rock of Israel spoke to me, He who ruleth over men must be just, ruling in the fear of God” (II Samuel 23:2, 3).

More people have been murdered by secular government than by any other. Mao Tse-tung murdered over sixty million of his own countrymen. Today the Obama administration considers Mao’s example of leadership as the ideal form of leadership.

Joseph Stalin murdered tens of millions of people. Adolf Hitler murdered millions of people.
I notice that the Democrats celebrate the visit of dictators to America. These would include Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Daniel Ortega, Kim Il Sung, Bashar al-Assad, and Muammar Gaddafi. It would appear that a dictatorship is what the Democrats desire for America, with themselves in charge.

The Vietnam War ended when the Democrats in Congress failed to fund the government of South Vietnam, which would have given them the ability to fight the war. Systemically, the North Vietnamese, after winning the war, killed the mountain tribesmen who were Christian. Democrats are antichristian as well as against national defense. Jimmy Carter while President of the United States stopped the building of the B-1 bomber. He also removed American control of the Panama Canal which later has come under the control of China. Democrats constantly like to defund American National Defense. Barak Husain Obama stopped the deployment of an anti missile shield in Europe and stopped the building of the new F-22 fighter at Boeing. He stopped the development of a missile shield for the United States which leaves America vulnerable to missile strikes. He wants to rid America of its nuclear arsenal.

Lyndon B. Johnson enacted a bill which took away the nontax status of churches, which spoke against politicians. This hindered the free speech of pastors and church leaders, who were in opposition to the liberal power leaders. What about the first amendment rights of pastors? Johnson’s bill is unconstitutional and remains in need of challenge.

The Democrats support homosexually, abortion, embryonic stem cell research, growing human body parts, and cloning of humans. Furthermore, for the most part unions are not-for-profit like churches. However, they are permitted to support and promote secular, immoral and socialistic and communistic causes.  Why are they exempt, while churches cannot speak freely?

Those societies which allow homosexuality, and the killing of children will be cast out of the land in which they live by the land where they live (Leviticus 18:21, 22, 24, 25, 28).

“Righteousness exalteth a nation but sin is a reproach to any people” (Proverbs 14:34).

Is your life style exalting to America or does it bring a reproach to the United States of America?

Block the Wasteful Davis-Bacon Act

Wisconsin Supreme Court Election: Is it David Prosser or Joanne Klopperberg? Who knows?

In another of those too close to call races, now Judge David Prosser is down by 204 votes. He was the judge facing a recall election because Governor Scott Brown is trying to level the playing field for taxpayers in Wisconsin. Out of control and angry public union leaders aided by seemingly the entire American labor movement is trying to regain the right to keep the cash cow union dues coming their way unfettered. Well they instituted a recall election, which was held last night.  Only a 1/3 of the eligible voters turned out and a good percentage were union-supporters it seems ...

Stand with Gov. Walker & Wisconsin GOP State Senators, I did!

Thuggish union leaders outside of Wisconsin are outraged that the Congress in Wisconsin would tamper with their cash cow, gravy train union dues. So upset that they are organizing to recall 8 Wisconsin State Senator, who dared to vote for fiscal responsibility and against union monopolistic tactics and policies. These tactics and policies added to the financial crisis that Governor Scott Walker and most of the GOP State Senators had the courage to address.

This is an important step for all of America. We must stop the favoritism and the cycle of Democratic support for unions and vice versa. Unions use their dues to fund politicians who will payback the unions with favored status and excessive benefits, not even provided by the best in private industry. Often very substandard work is rewarded because the union care only about protecting the dues pipeline …

Please join me in sending $8 as a donation to http://www.FrontlineWisconsin.com to support and to counteract the insurgent union-Democrat-Organizing-for-America's attack on policies and persons duly elected and serving to carry out the will of the people. That is, to cap spending and to get Wisconsin’s fiscal house in order.

This Wisconsin Teacher Needs Spell Check!

Hat tip to @lilleth71 who tweeted that we check out the great spelling skills of Wisconsin teachers. .

Governors Christie, Walker, & Kasich, et al are doing the right thing! Fire the teachers who lied about being sick. What an example to their students.

Wisconsin Public Sector Unions

Rush Limbaugh last week said something to the effect that "Public sector unions are mere money laundering operations that benefit the Democratic Party!"

He went on to say that $600B of the $700B federal stimulus money that went to Wisconsin, actually went to their public sector unions. 

Without those Chinese borrowed moneys Wisconsin and other states have to now make it on their own. Governors Walker in Wisconsin and Kasich in Ohio are boldly moving to curb the insatiable appetites for money (dues) and power of the union leadership. We must end their favored special interest status, which they now have with the Soetoro/Obama administration.

Unions' Pocket Protector

In the pocket of the unions

Friday Funnies found at WorldMag.com found on 022511
.

Wackenhut, Vodka, Butts, Labor Unions, Collective Bargaining, and Rachel Maddow's Hypocrisy

How dare Rachel Maddow suggest that the Wackenhut security workers should have been fired!  The vodka butt drinking is perfectly acceptable alternative lifestyle which should be protected from discrimination.  And you are guilty of hate speech!

In case you don't appreciate the sarcasm of the preceding paragraph, it was intended to point out the hypocrisy of the liberal homosexual agenda supporting Rachel Maddow.  Of course, even if the facts presented in the above video about the Wackenhut folks and Governor Walker is really true, that does not necessarily say anything one way or another about the wisdom of collective bargaining for public employees.

One example of a bad result of the hiring of a private security company doesn't necessarily mean that that it always a bad idea.  Rachel Maddow's sensationalism which takes the focus off of the real issue.  But I agree with her that Walker should be condemned if he exercised powers which did not belong to him.  But this is more hypocrisy on Maddow's part because she sees nothing wrong with outrageous expansions of federal power well beyond the limits placed by the Constitution.  All of these doctors who are giving fake doctor's notes to public employees attending protests is another thing that is taking away the focus from the real issue. Keep in mind that just because these doctors and protesters are committing fraud, doesn't necessarily mean that SOME public employees may have legitimate concerns about the proposed legislation.

Another flaw in her argument is that the Wackenhut employees were paid with taxpayer's money and chosen by a politician.  So what really is the difference between public and private?  An example of a real private sector solution would be to get rid of all public schools and turn the responsibility of educating children back to the parents where it belongs, entirely removing politicians and taxpayers' money from the equation.

Rather than resorting to sensationalism, we should have a real dialog about this issue of collective bargaining rights of public employees.  I actually don't know whether or not I support the proposed measures in Wisconsin and Ohio.  I certainly think that public school teachers are overpaid and as alluded to earlier, in my opinion, unnecessary.  But police and firefighters are another issue.  They certainly do earn their pay and I know some of them who are afraid that this legislation would endanger their livelihood.  It isn't just about pay, but they are afraid that they could fired for no reason and have no recourse.  Also, without collective bargaining, the local politicians could cut firefighter and police pay in order to take for themselves the money designated for that purpose.  (This is especially prone to happen in large cities.)  Generally, I believe that such problems should be handled at the most local level possible.  But one case which we need to consider is that many of the city police and firefighters live in the suburbs, and cannot vote for the politicians who make the decisions concerning their employment.  With collective bargaining, an arbitrator is chosen to decide the conditions of the employment.  This is not an ideal situation, but getting rid of it (or severely restricting it) for essential services like police protection is something that we need to think long and hard about before trying.  Again, I have not read Ohio's S. 5 or Governor Walker's plan so I don't know whether or not I would support it.  They are very complicated pieces of legislation and the laws already on the books are very complicated.  I doubt that most of the people on both sides of the issue have read and understood the proposed legislation and current law well enough to really make an informed decision.