Caroline and Hillary, It's Not What You Know . . .

Cartoon by Steve Kelley found on Townhall.com 12/31/08

These two women, Hillary Rodham-Clinton and Caroline Kennedy-Schlossberg have much in common. They both were related to former Presidents. Without that past association they would not be given a second look for any significant political office. They both accomplished little to qualify themselves for political office. In other words, their experience was very limited. They both benefit from media hype. They both are darlings of the mainstream media, at least at the beginning of their "careers." Both are very liberal. Both moved to New York. Both act very elitist.

Hillary Praises McCain’s VP Pick

“Hillary Clinton praised John McCain’s (VP) pick saying we should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin’s historic nomination.

“Then she went back to designing her "Hillary in 2012" website.”

- - - NewsBusted, Episode 197

NewsBusters is a conservative news and comedy website. Their newest NewBusted episode includes the excerpt below. See right panel of this blog and click on the video to watch this 2-3 minute comedy YouTube video.

The ‘08 Veep Choices, Tale of Two Women

Here are my predictions as to who the two major partis will choose to complete their tickets. As I have consistently stated, I do not like either candidate and if the election were today the only thing I know is that I would not vote for either Obama or McCain.

Republican Party Ticket:

John Sidney McCain (R-AZ), President
Sarah Louise Palin (R-AK) (Pronounced PALE-in), Vice-President

Don’t know who Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin is? See a video of her below. Palin is a better choice than Romney, Ridge or Lieberman. She is pro-life and apparently pro-traditional marriage. She is not as strong as I would like to see any candidate be regarding so-called homosexual “rights” and special advantages and privileges which that group constantly seeks. Palin is a conservative. Her selection would tend to energize social conservatives to some extent and would balance the GOP ticket, since McCain is more moderate and liberal than anything else. So far McCain has has done nothing to ingratiate himself to social conservatives in this campaign.



Democratic Party Ticket:

Barack Hussein Obama (D-IL), President
Hillary Rodham-Clinton (D-NY), Vice President

Obama will be pressed to select the Clintons to be his co-Vice Presidents. When he does he will surely not last the full term, because one way or another the Clintons will assume the presidency. By selecting Clinton, Obama will confirm all suspicions that he cannot make tough decisions, nor stand against strong opposition. The Clintons may help Obama win the election, but then watch your back Barack!

Rodham-Clinton Lacks Executive Experience

Two persons made interesting observations on, of all places. a liberal blog a few days ago. Referring to Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton they make these cogent observations:

"Proximity does not equal ability."

"Saying that Hillary has Executive Branch experience is like saying Yoko Ono was a Beatle."

A variation on the same theme is:

"Residency doesn't make a Presidency."

There is great truth in these statements. Beyond the fact that Hillary lived in the White House, neither she nor Barack Hussein Obama have the perquisite experience to serve as President. More importantly, they have the wrong political and philosophical orientation, both being extreme liberals and socialists in heart and action.

Barack Obama Full of Himself

Cartoon found on GOPUSA

.

I prefer to think of Barack H. Obama (D) and Mitt Romney (R) as empty suits and Hillary-Rodham Clinton (D) as an empty skirt. After all I am trying to be a diverse and equal opportunity herald of truth!

What is a Clintron?

A Clintron is a robot made of interchangeable human-like parts. A Clintron Robot is self-programmed to support the advancement of homosexuals, lesbians, trans-gendered, bisexuals and cross-dressers to the destructive end of the American culture and to preserve the repulsive right of women to murder tiny human beings - the American atrocity - abortion.

A vote for Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton is also a vote for former President and disbarred attorney Bill Clinton. The composite picture below is a picture of the Clintron Robot. Thanks to emailer LN for this graphic representation of the real Hillary Rodham-Clinton.

.

Clintron Robot: The Hill-Billy Model

Abortion "Rights"

(Manchester, N.H.) AP writer Nedra Pickler reports in a news item which I saw on OneNewsNow.com today that Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton brags in a campaign letter sent to New Hampshire voters that she is more pro-abortion, more for a woman’s right to murder her baby, than is Senator Barack Hussein Obama. She accused Obama of not being as adamant a defender of abortion as she is. She claimed that while he was a State Senator in Illinois he voted “present” instead of a registering a pro-abortion vote.

In reality Obama has an every bit as vile a record on abortion as Rodham-Clinton does. Pickler points out that, “During his eight years in the legislature, Obama cast a number of votes on abortion and received a 100 percent rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council for his support of abortion rights, family planning services and health insurance coverage for female contraceptives. He voted against requiring medical care for aborted babies who survive, a vote that especially riled abortion opponents.” Sound pretty pro-death to me, Senator Clinton.

Is this really something about which one should boast?

Pickler goes on to quote representatives of both the Rodham-Clinton and the Obama campaigns. “Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said the campaign decided to send the piece because "as Senator Obama has said, `voting records matter.' This is a critical issue for New Hampshire voters and they deserve a straightforward presentation of the facts about both candidates."

“Obama spokesman Bill Burton responded, "The Clinton campaign's false negative attacks were rejected by Iowa voters, and we expect that they'll suffer the same fate here in New Hampshire."

Their stands on the abortion issue alone disqualifies all the Democrat candidates as well as Mayor Giuliani from any consideration for my vote as president.

Time for a (Diaper) Change

A Michael Ramirez cartoon, Investors Business Daily, 1/7/08

I listened to much of the debate last night. From what I heard from the Democrats, it seemed to me that the only change that was needed was the diaper full of putrid diarrhea of far left ideology being foisted on the American people by the fearful foursome promoting false promises. Indeed, it is time for a change, the diaper needs to go.

Results of Iowa Caucus

Editorial Cartoon from today's online Columbus Dispatch

.

The following are the 2008 Iowa Caucus results provided by CNNPolitics.com:

.

Democrat Results:

Obama------940---38%
Edwards -----744----30%
Clinton-------737----29%
Richardson ---53 ----2%
Biden ---------23-----1% Withdrew from race yesterday

Undecided-----3------0%
Dodd-----------1-----0% Withdrew from race yesterday
Gravel ---------0-----0% barred from tomorrow's ABC-TV debate
Kucinich--------0-----0% barred from tomorrow's ABC-TV debate

Republican Results:

Huckabee--39,814--34%
Romney-----29,405---25%
Thompson---15,521---13%
McCain------15,248---13%
Paul---------11,598---10%
Giuliani-------4,013----4%
Hunter--------515----1% barred from tomorrow's ABC-TV debate

.

I don't usually buy a Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch newspaper but I was ill today having gone to the Emergency Room for the cold I could not shake. I wasn't sure how long I had to wait and wanted something to read. However, it wasn't until later in the morning that I finally got a chance to look seriously at the Democrat Dispatch. I noticed that a vary obvious attempt on the part of the paper to minimize Senator Rodham-Clinton's terrible third place finish, see how the box on the front page listed the results of the Iowa caucus:

Iowa scorecard

Support was clear for the winning candidates late last night, but the exact order and level of backing for those behind them was unclear:

Democrats
1. Barack Obama, 37 percent
2. John Edwards, Hillary Clinton

Republicans
1. Mike Huckabee, 34 percent
2. Mitt Romney, 25 percent
3. Fred Thompson, John McCain

The online version of the liberal Dispatch listed a time of 3:00 AM as for the story. I knew from listening to the radio last night that Rodham-Clinton had finished third before midnight. It seems to me that this newspaper was not accurate in its reporting for a political purpose.

Conservatives Can Laugh, Too 13

NewsBusters is a conservative news and comedy website. Here is one of their bits from their current episode. See right panel of this blog and click on the video to watch this 2-3 minute comedy YouTube.com video

"While campaigning for his wife (President) Bill Clinton refers to Hillary (Rodham-)Clinton as an “Agent of Change”. He means nothing smaller than $10s and $20s.”

- - - NewsBusted, Episode 128


One thing you can count on is that if any Democrat wins the Presidential election next Fall we will have our taxes raised and we will have less change. That is what President Clinton must be referring to when he says his wife is a change agent. She would be an agent of ALL our change loose and otherwise.

HUNTER TO HILLARY CLINTON DEBATE PLANT: "THANKS, SEND MORE!"

Hillary's Homosexual Horticultural Hoax

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 29, 2007

CONTACT: Gary Becks (619) 334-1655, dlhunter08@yahoo.com

San Diego, CA - - - GOP Presidential candidate Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) today sent the following response to Senator Hillary Clinton who planted a member of her campaign staff in the audience to ask a question at the Republican debate last evening in Florida. The retired military general, who announced during his question that he was gay, asked the candidates about their position on the Pentagon's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy regarding homosexuals serving in the military.


November 29, 2007

Dear Senator Clinton,

Regarding the "plant", retired BrigKeith H. Kerr. Gen. , that you sent to ask me the question at the CNN-YouTube debate last night in Florida …

Send more!!!

Merry Christmas,


Duncan Hunter


I received the above news relaeae from the Duncan Hunter for President campaign. Scripture says, "You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good" (Genesis 50:20)." The homosexual plant of the CNN/Democrat/homosexual axis meant to embarass and to trip up the GOP candidates, but it turns out they all did quite well against obviously biased questioners and the obvious liberal CNN.

Thanks to the transcription I found at the Swanp, here is Representative Hunter's well reasoned and thoughtful response, "General, thanks for your service, but I believe in what Colin Powell said when he said that having openly homosexual people serving in the ranks would be bad for unit cohesion.

"The reason for that, even though people point to the Israelis and point to the Brits and point to other people as having homosexuals serve, is that most Americans, most kids who leave that breakfast table and go out and serve in the military and make that corporate decision with their family, most of them are conservatives,'' Hunter said.

"They have conservative values, and they have Judeo-Christian values. To force those people to work in a small tight unit with somebody who is openly homosexual goes against what they believe to be their principles, and it is their principles, is I think a disservice to them. I agree with Colin Powell that it would be bad for unit cohesion.''
.
It surely wasn't surprising that the homosexual activist and Hillary Rodham-Clinton campaign operative was not happy with Rep. Hunter's or any of the GOP candidates answers. He was there to push his homosexual agenda not truly seeking the positions of the candidates. Agronomist and Senator Hillary "dirty tricks" Rodham-Clinton's campaign is in full left wing swing . . .

You Reap What You Sow

I recently saw this little story in my organization’s newsletter. It has application in business, family, relationships, community, church, politics or any other area of life.

The Seed

A successful businessman was growing old and knew it was time to choose a successor . . . Instead of choosing one of his directors or his children, he decided to do something different.

He called all the young executives in his company together. He said, “It is time for me to step down and choose the next CEO. I have decided to choose one of you.” The young executives were shocked, but the boss continued. “I am going to give each one of you a SEED today – one very special SEED. I want you to plant the SEED, water it, and come back here one year from today with what you have grown from the SEED I have given you. I will then judge the plants that you bring, and the one I choose will be the next CEO.”

A man named Jim, was there that day and he, like the others, received a SEED. He went home and excitedly told his wife the story. She helped him get a pot, soil and compost and he planted the SEED. Everyday he would water it and watch to see if it had grown. After about three weeks, some of the other executives began to talk about their SEEDS and the plants that were beginning to grow. Jim kept checking his SEED, but nothing ever grew.

Three weeks, four weeks, five weeks went by, still nothing. By now the others were talking bout their plants, but Jim didn’t have a plant and he felt like a failure. Six months went by – still nothing in Jim’s pot. He just knew he had killed his seed. Everyone else had trees and tall plants, but he had nothing.

Jim didn’t say anything to his colleagues, however. He just kept watering and fertilizing the soil – He so wanted the SEED to grow.

A year finally went by and all the young executives of the company brought their plants to the CEO for inspection. Jim told his wife that he wasn’t going to take an empty pot. But she asked him to be honest about what happened. Jim felt sick to his stomach, it was going to be the most embarrassing moment of his life, but he knew his wife was right. He took his empty pot to the board room.

When Jim arrived, he was amazed at the variety of plants grown by the other executives. They were beautiful – in all shapes and sizes. Jim put his empty pot on the floor and many of his colleagues laughed, a few felt sorry for him!

When the CEO arrived, he surveyed the room and greeted his young executives. Jim just tried to hide in the back. “My, what great plants, trees, and flowers you have grown,” said the CEO. “Today one of you will be appointed the next CEO.”

All of a sudden, the CEO spotted Jim at the back of the room with his empty pot. He ordered the financial director to bring him to the front. Jim was terrified. He thought, “ the CEO knows I’m a failure. Maybe he will have me fired!”

When Jim got to the front, the CEO asked him what had happened to his SEED. Jim told him the story. The CEO asked everyone to sit down except Jim. He looked at Jim, and then announced to the young executives, “Behold your next Chief Executive? His name is Jim! Jim couldn’t believe it. Jim couldn’t even grow his SEED.

Then the CEO said, “One year ago today, I gave everyone in this room a SEED. I told you to take the SEED, plant it, water it, and bring it back to me today. But I gave you all boiled SEEDS; they were dead – it was not possible for them to grow. All of you except Jim, have brought me trees and plants and flowers.

When you found that the SEED would not grow, you substituted another SEE for the one I gave you. Jim was the only one with the courage and honesty to bring me a pot with my SEED in it. Therefore, he is one who will be the new CEO?” The moral of the story:

· If you plant honesty, you will reap trust
· If you plant goodness, you will reap friends
· If you plant humility, you will reap greatness
· If you plant perseverance, you will reap contentment
· If you plant consideration, you will reap perspective
· If you plant hard work, you will reap success
· If you plant forgiveness, you will reap reconciliation

So, be careful what you plant now; it will determine what you will reap later.

In politics, for example, we should look for the person whose actions, their voting record their core beliefs and philosophy in particular, reflect or back up their campaign slogans or rhetoric.

Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton is a seething liberal, yet campaigns pretending to be a moderate or centralist. She visits black churches in the South and pretends to be a sister in the “faith.” However, her votes and her actions in support of abortion and the homosexual agenda are antithetical to basic Judeo-Christian values, to basic Christianity as found in the Judeo-Christian Bible. Another "virtue" of Senator Rodham-Clinton is her alleged vicious temper and mistreatment of staffers, which the opposite of planting goodness. What the carpetbagging New York Senator's campaign is good at nurturing is audience plants, see a related article, which I posted recently.

Likewise, Barack Hussein Obama, too, denies his Muslim raised background and that he, too, is claims to be a "Christian" trying to woe the black Christian voter. However, like Senator Rodham-Clinton he buys and sells the radical anti-God liberal Democrat Party platform. In fact, most, if not all of the Democrat Party presidential candidates are extreme socialists who want to tear down American values and destroy our Christian nation.

History Quiz – Part 2 – “Surprising” Answers

Here are the surprising answers. They definitely were to me. Surprising, but believable.


Answers:

(1) D. None of the above.
Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004

(2) D. None of the above.
Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007

(3) D. None of the above.
Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007

(4) D. None of the above.
Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007

(5) D. None of the above.
Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007

(6) D. None of the above.
Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005


I failed this test. I thought that the answers were primarily the communists. However, Hillary Rodham-Clinton is a wolf in sheep’s clothes. She is a chameleon. She has changed her color and her spots many times and pretends to be a moderate. Yet, at her core she is a radical liberal. She may be even more liberal and more radical as her husband. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Bill and Hillary: It has been a real trip, baby.

Bill Clinton & Hillary Rodham, Ca. 1970

Another friend of AGC, Bo, sent this penetrating, pertinent and pointed analysis of the pitiful Clinton presidency. It also puts in perspective the prospect of the return to power of this former first couple to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. That would be a very bad trip, indeed. A real bummer, man! 8 years was quite enough of the Clintons, thank you.

.

I left the content essentially of the email the same but added titles and some emphasis. I must at that I did not check out each accusation made by the written of the email, but I would trust the source more than I would trust President Clinton or Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton.

.

AMERICA'S FAVORITE (FOREVER FORMER) FIRST COUPLE

.

"Wonder what else is in those archives at the Bill Clinton Presidential Library and Massage Parlor? No wonder she dodged the direct question from a friendly Tim Russert this week!

"I had almost forgotten....Old draft evaders never die, they just have a haircut and shave.

HIS MILITARY CAREER FAILED TO MATERIALIZE

.

* Bill Clinton registers for the draft on September 08, 1964, accepting all contractual conditions of registering for the draft. Selective Service Number is 326 46 228.

* Bill Clinton classified 2-S on November 17, 1964.

* Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on March 20, 1968.

* Bill Clinton ordered to report for induction on July 28, 1969.

* Bill Clinton refuses to report and is not inducted into the military.

* Bill Clinton reclassified 1-D after enlisting in the United States Army Reserves on August 07, 1969, under authority of COL. E. Holmes.

* Clinton signs enlistment papers and takes oath of enlistment.

* Bill Clinton fails to report to his duty station at the University of Arkansas ROTC, September 1969.

* Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on October 30, 1969, as enlistment with Army Reserves is revoked by Colonel E. Holmes and Clinton now AWOL and subject to arrest under Public Law 90-40 (2) (a) registrant who has failed to report...remain liable for induction.

* Bill Clinton's birth date lottery number is 311, drawn December 1, 1969, but anyone who has already been ordered to report for induction is INELIGIBLE!

* Bill Clinton runs for Congress (1974), while a fugitive from justice under Public Law 90-40.

* Bill Clinton runs for Arkansas Attorney General (1976), while a fugitive from justice.

* Bill Clinton receives pardon on January 21, 1977, from President Carter.

* Bill Clinton becomes the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON ever to serve as President of the United States.

.

All these facts come from Freedom of Information requests, public laws, and various books that have been published, and have not been refuted by Clinton.

.

FAILED PRESIDENTIAL PROMISES

.

* After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

* After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

* After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

* After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

* After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible be hunted down and punished.

.

Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, DC. who are now dead would be alive today. THINK ABOUT IT!

.

FAILED MEMORIES

.

It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written. This from two people who spent 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath.

.

Sincerely,

.

Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (ret.)

.

.

Note: Commander HAMILTON 'MAC' McWHORTER U.S.N. Hamilton McWhorter first saw combat with VF-9 flying the F4F Wildcat from the U.S.S. Ranger in strikes against Casablanca. Transferring in March 1943 to the new F6F Hellcat aboard the U.S.S. Essex in the Pacific, he participated in the strikes against Marcus, Wake, Marshall and Gilbert Islands, Rabaul, Truk - where he scored a triple victory in a few minutes, and Saipan. Joining VF-12, he took part in strikes on Tokyo in February 1945, and Iwo Jima and Okinawa. With 12 air victories in 89 combat missions, 'Mac' McWhorter was the first carrier-based pilot to become a F6F double Ace. He retired from the Navy in 1969. Source

Clinton, China and the Moon

A Michael Ramirez Cartoon

With much thanks to former President Bill Clinton, China will be landing on the moon soon. Will America allow Hillary Rodham-Clinton to continue to add to her husband's terrible tainted legacy?

The Frontrunner Follies

The Frontrunners are Losers

The press is sure playing up the current GOP and Democrat presidential frontrunners, hoping that we will have a New York based street brawl in 2008 with the citizens of the USA the only clear losers, no matter who wins in any election involving these two candidates. Here are two recent comments or articles about the alleged frontrunners. If I was a composer I would write piece of music and call it "A New York Minuet" after these two birds of a feather.

GIULIANI – WHO IS LEFT

Pat Buchanan warns in a recent article quoted in a NewsMax.com report that “Support for Rudy Giuliani represents a return to liberal Republicanism that would strip the GOP of its hard-won progress on moral, social and cultural issues.” He specifies some of Giuliani’s liberal positions, “Pro-abortion, anti-gun, again and again he strutted up Fifth Avenue in the June Gay Pride parade and turned the Big Apple into a sanctuary for illegal aliens. . .”

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani is not my choice for President. Hopefully he will not be nominated. Hopefully the American voters will recognize the sham that he is and will select a principled conservative candidate to represent them in the upcoming election. He is living only off the reputation of a few moments of crisis leadership in his beleaguered city after 9/11.

RODHAM-CLINTON – WHO IS EVEN FURTHER LEFT

Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton says that she thinks highly of the United States -- but she wants to change it. OneNewsNow.com reported that Senator Rodham-Clinton, who is the Democrat Party presidential frontrunner, said, "This is a good and great country," to the applause of the crowd at the event. "Let's go out and change it and make history together. Thank you and God bless you!" She delivered that message Thursday night as friends, family, and supporters celebrated her 60th birthday with a star-studded fundraiser in New York.

Can you believe what this candidate wants to do? She wants to change a good and great country. She apparently wants to make the country bad and evil and reduce it to a second-rate status! That would make history, Senator, yes it would. That is exactly what her policies (Taxes, appeasing Terrorists, Same Sex Unions and Marriage, etc) and her programs (HillaryCare) and your creepy creeping liberalism would do. It would place America on the ash heap of history along with the Roman, the Mayan and the Soviet Union empires. On top of that, this godless, radical feminist, and seething liberal implores Almighty God to bless her supporters and to bless her version of a godless, heathenish, secular humanistic America. The America, which Senator Rodham-Clinton envisions and longs to shape, is one that our godly, Christian Founders would adamantly oppose. What hypocrisy, what audacity!

FRONTRUNNERS? NO.

Frontrunners, indeed! More like media-generated hype and hoopla, for these two are apostate atheistic domestic demigods, if you ask me!

Ecclesiastes Chapter 10 offers some good commentary of the two so-called frontrunners of their respective parties. Verse 1 applies to Mayor Rudy Giuliani: "Dead flies cause the ointment of the apothecary to send forth a stinking savour: so doth a little folly him that is in reputation for wisdom and honour." Verse 2 applies to both, but especially to Senator Rodham-Clinton: "A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left." Senator Rodham-Clinton's radical socialist (leftist) positions on the issues, her policies and her programs are for the most part foolishness. America, don't be duped by these foolish fabricated frontrunners! May God have mercy and spare America the looming disaster that potentially awaits us, if either of these two ever steps into the office of President.

New Yorkers Poluting Politics

T.D. forwarded this photo of former mayor Rudy Giuliani and former first lady and current Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton. Hopefully we can refer to both of them as former failed presidential candidates after the November '08 election.

Rudy's Last Chance to Save the Nation?

Neither of these two formidable politicians [or maybe even poluticians] has what it takes to be the President of the United States. Both are politicians first and statesman or stateswoman second. They care more about their own selfish ambitions than what is best for the country. Both excel in pandering to special interests and playing on their celeb status.

Neither are principled leaders who take the right stand on the key social issues of the day: abortion, homosexuality or education. Mayor Giuliani does somewhat get it right that our enemy is Islam and the terrorists it breeds. Other than that he and her highness are virtually indistinguishable as New York liberals. In good conscience I could not vote for either of these two candidates.

Speaking of Mayor Giuliani, there is a story today that quoted him as saying yesterday (Friday) that he misspoke when he said he spent as much time, if not more, at ground zero exposed to the same health risks as workers combing the site after the Sept. 11 attacks. When the famous mayor tried to explain his remarks he just further upset some of his critics. One of his critics, deputy fire Chief Jimmy Riches, who spent months digging for his firefighter son. is quoted as saying, “He is such a liar, because the only time he was down there was for photo ops with celebrities, with politicians, with diplomats."

Not to be outdone by the Mayor, Thursday evening at the homosexual-oriented "Visible Vote '08" debate or what i refer to as the debauchery debate Senator Rodham-Clinton glowingly spewed forth all her homosexuality supporting rhetoric accusing Karl Rove of using the issue of marriage merely as a political issue in the last Presidential election and that she stands with all her friends in the homosexual movement. She arrogantly reminded the audience that she helped to defeat the federal marriage amendment calling it hateful. She and all of her fellow Democrat political candidates are showing extreme amounts of “love” or pander to the purveyors of perversity last Thursday night.

Three (Morally) Blinded Mice, See How They Run

The trio, Barrack Obama, Hillary Rodham-clinton and John Edwards, are nothing more than 2 bit radical leftist politicians who are hell-bent on destroying America and remaking it into the image of some sort of socialist atheistic communistic global utopia

The only reason Rudy Giuliani is not included with the other leftists is because of his position on the war on terror, and his apparent understanding of this nation’s enemies. However on social issues he could be easily lumped together with the three liberal elite named above. The social issues are the most critical to the life blood of a nation. The social issues define the heart and soul of a nation.

The things that unite these three or make that four is their unabashed belief in a woman’s unequivocal “right” to kill her unborn baby – abortion-on-demand. The three, make that four aforementioned also wholeheartedly and unashamedly support the “right” of homosexuals to tout their perversity and to have their immorality justified and made "legal" and to be treated as normal, natural, healthy and “moral”. The three, make it four, by their demonstrative actions and positions, if not by their meaningless, empty words are untied in their contempt of the one true God of the universe and Jesus Christ, God-incarnate.

It is very important for the life and welfare of this nation that a true conservative, not a Bush clone or imitation pre-election promised “conservative” iike McCain, Romney or Giuliani are pretending to be, but a true principled conservative. Someone like Representative Duncan Hunter or Governor Mike Huckabee or Representative Tom Tancredo must grab the nomination from the main-stream media – establishment choice.

The voters, no America herself, must be given a clear alternative in 2008:

>>> Life (sanctify of personhood of human beings from conception through natural death) versus Death (abortion atrocity and euthanasia)

>>> Pro-family (one-man-one-woman marriage) versus Neo-“family” units (same sex and every other assorted antithesis of the natural family)

>>> American traditional values (adherence to the declaration, the constitution) versus Socialist-Humanist-Globalist values (atheism, communism, New Age religion)

>>> Willingness to battle the Islamo-Terrorists and their gumbas and backers and allies, the Communists, versus Unwillingness to do battle, to appease, to surrender and to shirk the responsibility to fight our sworn enemies.

We do not need a lukewarm, Bush-like “moderate” to run against these 2-bit radical leftist. I am afraid that President Bush has disgraced both the Conservative movement and the faith that he claims to be his, Christianity. No, we need a strong conservative voice. We need someone who is totally committed to Conservative principles and the ideals of our Founding Fathers. We need someone who will provide steady unwavering leadership even in the midst of bad press and poor poll numbers. Someone unafraid of doing the right thing at all times.

If we get any Democrat or any of the so-called media-sanctioned first tier Republican conservative fakers to be our next President we will surely be in trouble. The very sovereignty of this nation, the very welfare, the very existence of this nation is at stake.

Presidential Candidates for ’08, Part 1

The Godless, Yet “Faithful” Ones?

Today's article is a collaborative effort between gregjaye and Sam. This is part 1 of a two part article.

.

THE DEMOCRATS

.

The current crop of candidates in the Democrat Party camp is atrocious. How else can you say it? The leftist elite leadership have so captured the once moderately conservative party and transformed it into a socialistic, atheistic ensemble spouting communistic dogma. Their candidates will say and do anything to gain or regain or sustain power. They may be principled politicians, but their principles are evil and godless. By their actions and positions on the issues, it is not a stretch to conclude that the “we” in former Soviet Union leader, Nikita Khrushchev’s infamous “We will bury you,” declaration include the likes of Rodham-Clinton, Edwards and Obama.

At sixty, ‘60s hippie Hillary Rodham-Clinton is a chameleon, a radical leftist bent on reshaping America into a secular socialist state thereby destroying the America we know and love. Amoral, smooth talking, empty suit, media concocted Barack Hussein Obama, was a former community organizer and has a radical leftist background and a questionable religious and political upbringing. These two most likely will be the ’08 Democrat Party nominees for President and Vice President.

.

THE REPUBLICANS

.

The so-called top tier Grand Old Party (GOP) candidates are not very grand ,only very disappointing and trite. This trio possesses the same old array of traits, ideas and behaviors that cost many GOP candidates defeat in the election of ’06. Their top three candidates are moderates at best. More likely, they are closet liberals with one eye out for and one hand out to corporate interests. Like all of the Democrat candidates, the three top Republican candidates lack significant conservative principles and beliefs.

Romney, McCain and Giuliani pay homage to the Reagan legacy and ideals to score political points, but do it without engaging their whole hearts and minds. This year Governor Mitt Romney claims he is now pro-life, only God knows what he will be next year. Like President George W. Bush, Senator John McCain supports the war on terror, but remains pitifully weak on securing our southern border. McCain continues to push what President Ronald Reagan’s oldest son, Michael, calls the McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill- a “Comprehensive Destroy the Republican Party Bill.” Mayor Rudy Giuliani is just about as liberal as the Rodham-Clinton-Obama ticket on social issues, but he can’t bring himself to fess up to that fact.

.

THE 2008 ELECTION

.

The election of ’08 could be our last if this current group of candidates emerges as their parties choices. The nation is very vulnerable. The nation needs a strong leader to restore American values, to stem and purge the socialistic, humanistic, secularist advances of the past 50 or 60 years. For the sake of this great nation I certainly hope and pray that the GOP settles on a strong conservative candidate who can articulate his positions in a way to rally average Americans to reject the Bush-McCain-Pelosi-Reid way of government and to provide strong, principled Reagan-like leadership.

Tomorrow we will share a list of preferred candidates for President.

To be continued.

Rodham-Clinton Scraps DOMA Support

HILLARY'S REAL LIBERAL CREDENTIALS

Jim Brown of OneNewsNow.com reports today that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham-Clinton has flip-flopped and now no longer supports the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, a piece of legislation that President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1996. Brown notes, "DOMA bans federal recognition of same-sex "marriages. Rodham-Clinton as recently as July 2004 is on record as saying she believed marriage is a "sacred bond" between a man and a woman.

Brown writes, “In May 2005, the senator from New York told CNN, "Well, I don't know many Democrats who support [homosexual/lesbian] marriage. In fact, I don't and haven't for, you know, years before I became a senator." But apparently Senator Clinton now can be counted among several Democrats to do support same-sex marriage, because she says she no longer supports DOMA. The Democratic presidential front runner spelled out her new position in a candidate questionnaire for the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a homosexual activist group in Washington.

Brown continues, “Results from the questionnaire also indicate unanimous support from seven Democratic presidential hopefuls on such homosexual-related issues as

· civil unions and federal benefits for same-sex couples;

· passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and so-called "hate crimes" legislation;

· homosexual adoption; and

· repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on homosexuals serving in the military.

Interestingly, all but one candidate -- Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) -- oppose "allowing civil marriage rights for same-sex couples."”

And these radical liberals claim to be “progressives” or “moderates” or “representing the majority of American opinion.” I say “fried baloney with a little mustard on top.” Clearly the 7 current Democratic candidates are far left in their positions. It is only a matter of who is further out there in left field. To me Kucinich is outta-the-park and most of the other six are not far off.
.

GOP DEBATE - TRUE CONSERVATIVE CREDENTIALS?

I certainly hope and pray a solid conservative candidate emerges during the upcoming primaries because none of the top three GOP candidates could be said to be true conservatives. They may be C-RINOs (Conservative Republicans in NAME Only) in but not true conservatives. Neither do I support nor do I trust any of the top three GOP candidates to be strong on traditional marriage. They are too Bush-like in their deceptive ways and means. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice . . . I do not anticipate any of them being consistent on the conservative issues that count from abortion to immigration to tax reduction or reform to the war on terror. The debate last night proved one thing, evoking the name of Ronald Reagan as Governor Mitt Romney did, does not make you conservative any more than Senator Kerry’s service in Vietnam made him any kind of a war hero. Romney, Senator John McCain and Mayor Rudy Giuliani are showman-politicians first and foremost and lack the consistent demonstration of core conservative principles.

What we desperately need is a true conservative Presidential candidate Governor Mike Huckabee, Representative Tom Tancredo, Representative Duncan Hunter and even Senator Brownbeck would make a better president than any of the Democrat Seven or media-blessed top tier GOP three. But I don’t know if any o those four can come overcome the deliberate snub of the media, have sufficient funds and put together an effective campaign to win enough primaries to garner the nomination. I would be comfortable with any of those men, however.

Maybe we do need someone with conservative credentials with real charisma such as former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich or Senator Fred Thompson. Where are the Washingtons or Adams when you really need them?