The Terror of Islam, Part 2

This is part 2 of a series, The Terror of Islam.

I recently received an email which encapsulated the threat that emanates from Islam. Islam is not the innocuous 'religion of peace’ that our politically correct and corrupt politicians make believe that it is. As stated in the blog post yesterday, Islam is a political, militaristic, and religious system. Its creed and principles are generally antithetical to our American culture and values. These ideas are also in stark contrast to our Judeo-Christian heritage. Read the following content and contemplate its message.

If this doesn’t wake people up...nothing will. And if you think that 75% of Muslims are peaceful, guess again. They are just sitting back waiting for the word from the other 25%. They all use the same "Bible" and they are just one big family with the same mindset.

THIS ISN'T VERY PROMISING... Well America will you wake up in time or will your children grow up in another world? For everyone who wanted change here we go... How about this for change?

Look at who has been permitted to infiltrate the inner sanctum of the White House.

Arif Alikhan - Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Mohammed Elibiary - Homeland Security Adviser

Rashad Hussain - Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)

 

Salam al-Marayati -  Obama Adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council and is its current executive director

Imam Mohamed Magid - Obama's Sharia Czar from the Islamic Society of North America

Eboo Patel - Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships

 

Well, my fellow Americans, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse. The wolves will be herding the sheep! [NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant?... Just wondering.]  Now Devout Muslims are being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions? Doesn't this make you feel safer already? That should make the United States much safer, huh!! Was it not "Devout Muslim men" that flew planes into U.S. buildings only 10 years ago? We must never forget this. Was it not a Devout Muslim man who killed 13 at Fort Hood? (He killed "from within" - don't forget that.)

To be continued

Obama's Dishonest Propaganda

Obama said, “Ultimately, I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress…judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint — that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law.”

It is not at all “unprecedented” that the Supreme Court has struck down Federal laws on the basis that they are unconstitutional.  It has happened over a hundred times.  Obama later said that he was only talking about overturning laws on the basis that the Commerce Clause does not grant Congress the authority to pass a certain law since Wickard v. Filburn.  Again, this is not unprecedented, nor should it be.  Obama is basically saying that 10^th Amendment should have no application whatsoever. 

He is not saying that other parts of the constitution can’t be used as basis for striking down laws, just the linchpin of the entire Constitution.  For example, he is perfectly fine with allowing the courts to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, as evidenced by his recent decision to order the DOJ to stop defending its constitutionality in court.

Whether or not judges should be allowed to “strike down” laws is another matter, but certainly judges should not take part in enforcing a blatantly unconstitutional law.

Notice Obama says that it is overturning a law passed by Congress which is so unprecedented.  This is despite that the 10^th Amendment which ensures that the majority of powers belong to the states and despite that it is usually when state or local laws are overturned that there is the most outcry from the religious right, and usually justifiably so.  The only problem with the religious right is that, not knowing the Constitution (or not caring about what it says) often unwittingly advocate unconstitutional centralization of power in Washington because of some position on a moral issue which they want to be enforced.  Furthermore the religious right is often very complacent about unconstitutional laws which were passed by the left a long time ago.  They either think that it is unreasonable that these should be overturned because they don’t think of them as being leftist policies or they themselves are really somewhat leftist.  For example, if it is unconstitutional for the federal government to force us to buy Obama-approved health insurance, how can it not also be unconstitutional for them to force us to pay into Medicare or Socialist Security?  People just don’t think critically and/or are ignorant of the Constitution.  But Obama clearly wants both the left and the right to remain ignorant of the Constitution and especially the 10^th Amendment.

Andrew Breitbart on the Pigford Case

Click here for part 2.

Obama Betrays Our Ally

The Underwear Bomber's burning briefs

Hat Tip to Jill Stanek, who had posted these cartoons on her Sunday Funnies post on her blog yesterday. These all dealt with President (Barry Soetoro aka Barack) Obama and Janet Napolitano's Department of Homeland (In-)Security's muff of the near-miss Underwear Bomber . . .

Cartoon by Ken Catalino at GoComics.com...

. Cartoon by Pat Oliphant at GoComics.com...
.
. Cartoon by Michael Ramirez at Townhall.com...
.
Cartoon by Steve Benson at GoComics.com...

Cartoon by Nick Anderson at GoComics.com...