What Democrats Want, Day 88, Countdown to Oblivion? Devaluing the Vote

As of today, there are 88 days until the most consequential election in American history. This is what they say about many past elections, but this is really it. For if the Democrats seize power – control of the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate and the Presidency – and doing it by hook or by crook (the justifies the means, you know) America as we know it will be forever changed. America envisioned and created by the Founding Fathers will disappear into the shadows of history.

The ungodly secular-humanists/Marxists slow march through America’s institutions over the last 100 years or so will have reached a crescendo – fulfilling Mr. Obama’s fundamental transformation of America. Never again will the demonic Democratic Party relinquish its grip on political power and control of the masses.

Envision with me what a Socialist Democratic Party, takeover, a bloodless coup, a regime change, would look like. This is the first of a series of daily articles leading up to the 2020 General Election scheduled for November 3, 2020.

Watering Down the Vote

Illegal aliens voting, dead people voting, people voting multiple times, and felons voting all combine to offset the votes of law-abiding American citizens.   States removing voter identification requirements especially through mass mailing out of blank ballots to everyone currently listed on the voter rolls lends itself to rampant election and voter fraud.  

In the large populated state of California and other places is an increasing problem of ballot harvesting, which is:

the collecting and submitting of absentee or mail-in voter ballots by volunteers or workers. It occurs in some areas of the U.S. where voting by mail is common but is illegal in some other states.

Who tends to benefit from election and voter irregularities? Why it is the communistic Democratic Party if it manages to retain the U.S. House, wins the Senate and the White House in November. Yes, the Democrats will stop at nothing to try to win the upcoming election.  The end justifies the means for the Democrats.

Open Border, Open Voting

Illegals will be welcomed with open arms. With all the “success” of the pro-death Democrats protecting a woman’s right to murder her baby, America will need workers to replacing our aging population.  The swarms of illegals will include Jihadists and criminals and those who will make no making no significant contribution to the country, but will only be an additional drain on an debt ridden country.

We Are on the Precipice 

Patriots, Christians and freedom-loving people of all ethnicities must vote this year to keep the Democrats from gaining absolute power. We now have less than three months to do all we can to keep USS America from sinking.

For if the communistic Democratic Party makes a clean sweep of both Houses of Congress and the Presidency, be assured that America, like past and current tyrannical regimes, will become a totalitarian one-party controlled nation.

Could it be that a communistic Democratic takeover would be God’s final judgement on this nation for turning its collective back on Him?  And failing to repent of our evil ways? He has long tolerated the on-going holocaust of abortion, the many flavors of sexual perversity practiced, flaunted in movies, music, the internet, and television, etc. and now even being taught in public schools, K-12.

However, we still have time, 88 days... let's make the best use of them.  

Why not call them what they really are?

This post is about semantics.  In particular, why is it that the names we use to describe political opponents and their ideologies are important? 

For years, we tended to call Democrats like Bill Clinton liberals.  To us, the word liberal was a negative term.  But actually, a liberal is someone who believes in liberty.  The word liberal can also be used to describe one who is generous.  But when we talk about Bill Clinton or Barack Obama as being liberal, this is hardly what we mean.  In fact, they are quite the opposite.  So I don’t think that we should use this term.

In recent years, the word progressive has perhaps become a more popular term for the type of political bent we are trying to describe.  There is even an auto insurance company which has taken on this name (and they are, in fact, very progressive in that sense).  But progressive really just means someone who is in favor of progress.  This is not necessarily bad.  Despite what Michele Bachmann says, the United States did start as a Republic in which slavery was legal (in most states, at least).  In other words, after winning the Revolutionary War, not everyone was instantly free.  Although other approaches to gain racial equality were actually detrimental to the cause of freedom, nonetheless there were beneficial progressive measures like the 13^th and 15^th Amendments.  In fact, the American Revolution itself and the adoption of the original Constitution and Bill Rights were, at the time, very progressive as well.  In a larger sense, positive progress can take place in areas other than political, such as science.  The word progress (in regards to science) even appears in the Constitution.  But “progress” is not good when it comes to mean legalizing murder and forcing people to support and condone degrading behavior such as homosexuality.  “Progress” which denies parental rights and accepts the neglecting of the parental responsibilities is also not beneficial.

Everybody has probably seen the bumper sticker “Socialism Doesn’t Work”.  If you are thinking that word Socialist is better to use for the type of people we are talking about, you are getting a lot warmer.  But here is why that word is still not quite right.  A socialist tends to want to take away all private property by means of government legislation.  In contrast, a fascist (or corporatist) is someone who wants all property to be confiscated by means of a corporate takeover of everything.  Same result, different means.  But modern leftists in America seem to be employing both tactics simultaneously.  So the distinction between “left” and “right” is now nothing but a mere illusion.  An umbrella term for this desire to put all property into a central ownership is called collectivism which is a form of totalitarianism or statism.  Another reason why Socialist isn’t quite right is because there is such a thing as voluntary socialism (i.e. utopian socialist societies).  But we are really talking about people who want to force this way of living onto everyone.  And thirdly, the words socialism, collectivism, totalitarianism or statism do not necessarily encompass things like abortion, homosexuality, and other social issues as the words liberal and progressive did (although sometimes erroneously). 

So what is the best word to use?  How about extortionist, murderer, kidnapper, thief, or pervert?  If you want to sum all these up into one word, that one word could be God-hater, criminal or lawbreaker.  Why not call them what they really are?

Count the Lies, the President Speaks to Congress

Cartoon by Glenn Foden as found at Townhall.com 9/8/09

Liberties or Lies?

I, for one, will be counting the untruths that our alleged President Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama proclaims during his speech tomorrow evening to the Joint Session of Congress. In an apparent desperate move, the president and his teleprompter will try to sway the congressional members still on the fence to vote his way (or else).

The American people have been fooled badly by this man in November 2008. After the spending spree we have witnessed after Inauguration Day, I think the jig is up. Soetoro/Obama is a European Socialist/would-be third world type dictator disguised as a genuine American. That disguise is getting more exposed. This summer, Americans, as evidence by TEA Parties, Town Halls, phone calls, letters, birthday cards, and other forms of protest, have tried to tell the President and Congress that the majority of Americans DO NO WANT the complete redo or makeover of the American Health Care System because of the maybe 12-15 million people who do not have adequate coverage. Certainly there are less costly and less destructive ways to correct this problems of the truly uninsured.

Like I said, I will be trying to enumerate the lies that will be told in tomorrow evening Presidential address. Certain lies, which will again be perpetrated, will be that 45-48 million are now in need to be helped because they are uninsured. Another lie is that the opposition party does not have any solutions to offer. Another lie is that abortion and euthanasia will not be included as mandates in the so-called reform package. Another lie to look for is that you can always keep your current health insurance plan. This is only temporary, at best. You can keep it as long as it does not change. Once it changes you are obligated to take on a the government mandated plan or benefit package.

This president's spending ways are out of control. This government, which is in power, like every totalitarian state before it, lusts to control every facet of its peoples lives. They are like leaches sucking the life blood, the freedom, from red-blooded, free Americans.

So I will be watching and counting the lies in the President’s final attempt to salvage a severely flawed and freedom-sapping redo. If ObamaCare or some iteration thereof ever passes, it will ultimately lead to destruction of the American Health Care System we have come to expect and for so long have taken for granted along with our liberties.

Got Milk?