WHY IS THE BIRTHER QUESTION STILL BEING RAISED?
MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE THESE THINGS HAVEN'T BEEN DISPUTED.
Mystery
resurfacing again.............
|
1. Back in 1961 people
of color were called 'Negroes'. So how can the Obama birth certificate state
he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?
2. The birth
certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4,
1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right?
At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is age 25 years
old and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa". This
wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not
even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth and 27 years after
his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that
did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the
"British East Africa Protectorate".
3. On the birth certificate released by the
White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity &
Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in
question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and
"Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change
to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these
two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a
birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it
until 1978?
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major
media?????
Resources:
Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment