"The
In-Equality Act, HR 5, unfortunately, isn’t about equality at all. Rather, it’s about
government-imposed ideology and unfairness…" (a) What would the so-called, mislabeled "Equality Act" do? What would be the intended and unintended consequences be? This a very dangerous piece of legislation.
(10.) It would lead to more parents
losing custody of their children. In Cincinnati a female child was removed from
her parents when they objected to her “transitioning” from female to male. (b)
(9.) It makes changeable sexual conduct or
behavior a special protected class, which was never intended to be part of the
1964 Civil Rights Act. Race, Age,
Disability and Sex (male or female) are IMMUTABLE characteristics, sexual behavior
or identity are not.
(8.) It would discriminate against and penalize Americans
who don’t affirm new sexual norms or gender ideology.
(7.) It would shut down charities, such as adoption agencies, in violation of
their traditional beliefs on marriage and family. The AFA
adds, “Adoption and foster care agencies will be forced to place
children into same sex households and into homes of individuals suffering from
gender confusion.” (c)
(6.) It would compel speech making it against the
law to reject the fantasy that a biological man could become a woman with or without
mutilating their bodies through reassignment surgery or hormone therapy.
(5.) It would encourage public schools to further
indoctrinate students into all sorts of sexual perversity against the will of
parents.
(4.) It would allow more biological males to
compete in and defeat females in sporting events. (d)
(3.) It would make it easier for sexual assault to
be committed against girls and women because the current bathroom policy of
Target Stores allow biological men claiming to be women to use women’s rest
rooms and dressing rooms would become the law of the land. The AFA adds, "Amusement parks, recreation centers, skating rinks, and daycare centers, etc. will be forced to employ people whose values on sexuality deviates from those of the employer." (c)
(2.) It will reverse the
long-standing religious liberty protections provided by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
(RFRA) of 1993 signed by President Clinton.
(1.) It would be used to force medical
professionals to violate their conscience. “Believe it or
not, Democrats didn’t just expand the meaning of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to
include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity”—they’ve also defined it to
mean “pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition.” In other words,
under the terms of this proposal, “pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical
condition … shall not receive less favorable treatment than other physical
conditions.”” In other words, this law would promote abortion.(e)
Notes
(c) Recent American Family Association Action Alert.
(d) Several of these reasons are based on American
Family Association’s AFA Journal, June
2019, page 6, “Equality Act cannot promise equality for all.”
No comments:
Post a Comment