Thursday, April 27, 2006

6 – Sherrod Brown or Sam Keiser? ‘06 Ohio Democratic U.S. Senate Race, Part 4 of 5 – Fiscal Accountability

Today, is the fourth of a five part series, which is intended to outline the key issues facing the Ohio U.S. Senator beginning in January 2007 and beyond. Today we look at issues related to finances.

The following table compares and contrasts how the two 2006 Ohio Democratic opponents for U.S. Senate differ in their basic beliefs about issues dealing with fiscal accountability:



THE ISSUE: ………… CANDIDATE BROWN: ….… CANDIDATE KEISER:


TAXES
Making the Bush tax
cuts permanent:
………..…. NO………………………………… YES ………………

Eliminating the
estate tax:
……….……..….… NO …………………………….…. YES ……………..…

Reduce the
“Marriage tax”:
……………. NO…………………………………..YES……………..…

Tax cuts for
small business:
……………. OPPOSES ………………………… FAVORS …….…


End offshore tax
havens and promote
small businesses:
……..…...NO…………………………….…… YES……………

SPENDING
Reforming the UN by
restricting US funding:
….. NO …………………….…………. YES ……………

Banning family planning
funding in US & abroad:
.. NO …………………….…………. YES ……………

BARRIERS TO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT &
REVENUE GENERATION

Capping damages and
settling time in
medical lawsuits:
…..…….. NO ………………………………… YES……………

Not allowing product
misuse legal actions
against gun makers:
……... NO ………………………………… YES ……………

Limiting attorney fees
in class action lawsuits:
NO…………………………………… YES………………

Restricting frivolous
lawsuits:
………………………… NO…………………………………... YES………………



John F. Kennedy said that to stimulate the economy and to increase revenue, we must reduce taxes, not increase them. According to Mr. Brown's voting record my opponent does not agree.

The deficit is indecent. We must do all we can to stimulate economic growth and to control our spending. We must be willing to make deep cuts in programs and projects that do not work. For example, why fund the United Nations when it works against us and our interests? Why do we keep pouring money into education and continually get poor results? We must carefully evaluate everything that government does.

Agency bureaucrats must have good justification for their budget requests. In fact, it would be a good idea to introduce zero-based budgeting into the budgeting process. A national goal might be to cut spending across the board by 3-5 % until the deficit is eliminated. To produce a national budget that insures an annual surplus. This surplus revenue then must be used to pay down our national debt.


As a nation we should look seriously at abolishing the IRS. We must implement a better system such as taxing consumption (national sales tax) instead of income. This may encourage Americans to save more.

We must stop putting Social Security Funds into our general fund and thereore spending these funds for short-term purposes. Let's make and keep Social Security solvent. If we don’t have money to operate all our programs then we must prioritize those that are needed the most and eliminate what we cannot afford.

We must more aggressively pursue identification and elimination of waste, fraud and abuse and severely punish those who do so.

Besides lowering taxes and making tax cuts permanent, we should remove other roadblocks to economic development such as legislated environmental extremism which only increases the cost of doing business without actually benefiting the environment. Unreasonable and unbridled monetary damage awards are ruining whole industries and are increasing cost to the consumer. One example is healthcare, where medical professionals operate in constant fear of lawsuits. Another example is product liability legal actions. Is this driving some of our manufacturing businesses out of business or causing them to move out of the country?


If we citizens are expected to live within our means, then our government must live within its means. Congress must not spend more than what is brought into the treasury, and they must even insure a surplus to be used for deficit reduction. Legislators are needed who will bring old fashion common sense and frugality to Washington.

There are now only 6 more days until Ohio Voters can make A Good Choice on Tuesday, May 2nd in the Democratic Primary Election!

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:55 AM

    Are you serious? People like you accualy exist in the Civilized world. It makes me sick that anyone could be so blind and ignorant of other peoples cultures. I am a christian, i have gone to church all my life and nowhere does the bible or God give people like you the authority to take his name and teachings in vain as you do. You are a piss stain on the toilet seat that is america. its people like you that make me think the terrorists may not have been all so wrong. Their planes just missed the target, they should have been pointed at you and your ideas insted of the thousands of good hoinest thinking americans they were, they died for your idiotic ideas, their blood is on your hands. Maby im not right but i do know one thing, if i am wrong then come judgement day i will see you in hell.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:30 AM

    All you Christian Zelots are the same you know that. Brain washed by a book that at its best has been twisted and mislead. I dont understand what goes on in your brainwashed heads, all i know is that it cant be good. You ARE what is wrong with America. Trouble is you probly arnt even man enough to read this far, and even if you are you are so closed minded so brain washed and so afraid that all your rantings are going to be in vain that you will never reply. You are scared because you have no proof, scared because you dont have a leg to stand on, scared because deep down inside you know what you think is wrong. You and your kind fight with the ferocity of a people who know they are wrong, who know they are assholes and know that if their ideas were ever truly evaluated they would be completely bunk. So come on be a man and tell me what you are, are you a coward or are you a man, do you really beleive this or are you just a HACK, a low life peice of dog shit that cant even fess up to your own faults?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with all of what you say on this post except for the cap on medical malpractice damages. The real solution is to throw out all cases except the ones in which the doctors delibrately did not do what they said that they were going to do or misrepresented their credentials, in other words, cases of fraud. How would you like it if you were sued every time you made an honest mistake at your job?

    You should report these other bloggers for their foul language. At least edit out the bad words. You have many detractors, but hang there Sam. I am praying for you.

    ReplyDelete