Friday, December 31, 2010

Top 2010 villains and heroes

The following was inspired by a radio program I heard on American Family Radio (, AFA Report,  which discussed the villains and heroes of the past twelve months. I listened to that program and interjected some of my own thoughts and opinions in the content below.

Tea Party participants and Tea Party supported politicians like Joe Miller across the nation
These are the everyday men and women who rose up against a growing tyrannical Leviathan, which is extending its powerful tentacles from Washington, D.C. to the four corners of the nation. Although Joe Miller, the Republican who upset Senator Lisa Murkowski in the GOP Primary Election in Alaska, but just recently indicated that he would not contest her being seated next week as Senator from Alaska. Joe typified the discontent felt by a lot of people with the status quo in both major political parties. The Soetoro/Obama-Pelosi-Reid leftist agenda was resoundingly rejected in November. We are now expecting a lot from newly elected leaders like Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Tim Scott, Daniel Webster and other strong principled conservatives being sworn in the new Congress on January 6th, 2011. 

The President and the 111th Congress
The President and the Democratic-led Congress robbed the American people and America of a great amount of liberty. The deficit was increased more than any other President or Congress ever had before. They did this with unwise socialistic spending sprees. They took money they did not have and gave it to businesses that they should have let fail, they passed a Stimulus bill that stimulated only the cancerous growth of government and favored unions and other of their cronies. The weakened the military and our national defense by insisting on the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the quick, thoughtless passage of START. They used every trick and lie to pass the Health Care Control bill.

Salvatore Augustine Giunta
Giunta is a staff sergeant  in the United States Army. He is the first living person to receive the United States military's highest decoration for valor, the Medal of Honor, for actions that occurred since the Vietnam War. Giunta was cited for saving members of his squad on October 25, 2007 during the Ware in Afghanistan. What a contrast with low lifes such as the Jihadist Major Nidal Malik Hasan who killed soldiers at Fort Hood or traitor Private Bradley Manning who compromised many secrets by releasing them to WikiLeaks.

Bradley E. Manning.
Army private and traitor Manning was charged in July 2010 with the unauthorized disclosure of U.S. classified information He is being held in solitary confinement at the Marine Corps Brig Quantico, and is expected to face a court-martial [and hopefully, a firing squad]    in the spring of 2011.  

Pastor Cary Gordon and the Voters in Iowa
The patriotic and principled voters in IOWA in November removed three Iowa Supreme Court Justices, who had taken it upon themselves to declare same-sex marriage to be legal against the will of the people and against law of nature. The people felt that the judges overstepped their bounds and booted them out of office. 

National Public Radio (NPR) for firing Juan Williams
NPR, the taxpayer funded voice of subversion, fired Williams for expressing his honest opinions regarding his discomfort in seeing Muslims clad in their traditional garb boarding a plane. One of the first tasks of the new Congress should be to cut off all taxpayer funds to this anti-American anti-Christian leftist propaganda machine, NPR and its evil sister PBS.

Explaining Qualitative Easing

Hat tip goes to!/First_Patriots where I first saw the link to the informative animated video below. This is a good explanation of what the Federal Reserve’s policy of qualitative easing is, which simple speaking is printing money. This YouTube video has had almost 4 million views. The video discusses Federal Reserve Bank, Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Chairman, Goldman Sachs, and the United States Treasury and their interrelationships.

When the 112th Congress commences next week high on its agenda should be an audit of the Federal Reserve. Congressman Ron Paul was recently appointed Chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy Subcommitte of the U.S. House of Representatives' Financial Services Committee. 

If anyone can expose the wrongdoing and corruption of that unaccountable entity (the Federal Reserve Bank) Rep. Paul can and will. His subcommittee  has jurisdiction over monetary policy, currency, commodity prices, and matters related to the Federal Reserve Bank generally. 

Why ObamaCare must be repealed!

There was an excellent Letter to the Editor in the weekend edition of the USA Today (December 30, 2010), “Obama oversteps yet again on end-of-life issues.”  The author, Marvin L. Hoovis, M.D.; Centerville, Massachusetts, is a physician who has a number of legitimate concerns about the so-called health care ‘reform’ rammed through Congress earlier this year despite the objection of the majority of Americans. I underlined the key points of the editorial.

“It seems that President Obama remains committed to reducing medical services. Because of the controversy over the issue of end-of-life planning, that proposal was removed from the health care bill. Now Obama has slipped in a Medicare regulation that will pay physicians who discuss end-of-life options with patients at the time of their annual physicals.

“This service will be compensated by Medicare, which is headed by Obama appointee Donald Berwick, a physician committed to rationing care. Whether called end-of-life discussions or death panels, these options are designed to reduce services. This government action will further intrude on the physician-patient relationship.
A complete repeal of the health care law is necessary. Reasons for a repeal include, among other things,
·        the fact that a partisan Democratic-controlled Congress used unprecedented measures to pass the extremely controversial legislation;
·        misleading budget numbers were provided that did not adequately note the actual increased costs;
·        the legislation increases fees and taxes for businesses, providers and the patients; and
·        administration appointees have been allowed to write rules and regulations that cannot be challenged. This eventually could lead to final medical decisions being made by the secretary of Health and Human Services and not physicians.
These are all important and valid reasons to repeal this law and start over to achieve bipartisan legislation that can really improve access to care and services; reduce costs with tort reform; and end waste, fraud and inappropriate government rules and regulations.”

I agree with Dr. Hoovis. It seems to me that the first order of business of the new and more conservative 112th Congress which begins its difficult work on Thursday, January 6th, will be to repeal and/or completely defund, to the greatest extent possible, this heinous, unnecessary, unwise, and costly legislated socialist program. The new Congress must also turn back or limit the damage done by present administration and past Congress.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Conspiracy Theory:Concentration Camps in the USA

Is this for real, or just sensationalism?  Click here to read H.R. 645.

A Different Take on Julian Assange

To most, he is either a hero or a villain.  He is either champion of the people against corrupt government or a terrorist.  I do not believe that either is an apt description of him, his supporters, or Wikileaks.

Before I get to Mr. Assange, though, I want to take a look at Bradley Manning.  He is not someone who I would hold up as being a picture of virtue.  For one thing, he is a homosexual.  Homosexuality is wicked behavior and should be condemned to highest degree.  Secondly, he is (allegedly) guilty of stealing classified documents.  Even though I agree with him that the corruption of government must be exposed, theft is not an ethical way of dealing with it.  But I do think that he should get a fair trial and shouldn’t be tortured for information or anything like that.  If it is proven that he really is guilty of this crime, he should face an appropriate punishment.  If it could further be proved that he intended to release the documents and that the information contained in them would aid our enemies, then this would be treason.  However, if some of the documents prove that our government undertook illegal actions, then I believe that his actions would be justified if only those portions were released.

Assange, on the other hand, should be protected by the First Amendment IF his only involvement was publishing information.  Remember the First Amendment protects freedom of the press.  There are no exceptions given.  The First Amendment came after the treason clause and the rest of the Constitution drafted by the Convention in 1787.  Therefore, it takes precedence.  The First Amendment originally applied to acts passed by Congress, and therefore any enforcement of any Act (such as the Espionage Act of 1917) would be limited to actions other than publishing and free speech.  I definitely think that there should not be a different standard applied to Wikileaks than the New York Times, which published the same information.  But even if Assange did not commit a prosecutable act, that does not necessarily morally justify it.  And neither does it justify the actions of the New York Times.  The First Amendment does not prevent people from voting with their wallets.  (Though I think the ACLU would interpret it that way.)

However, if it can be proven that Assange played some other role in this besides just publishing the information, then the United States may have a legitimate case against him.  Some possible suggestions are that he recruited people to steal the information and that he knowingly received stolen materials.  And if it were not for the incorporation of the First Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment (which is I believe is spurious) then it would be theoretically possible for Assange to tried by a state if it could be proven that the publication of the information aided our enemies, leading to deaths and/or injuries to citizens of that state.  That’s not going to happen, but maybe it should. 

As for the contents of the leaked material itself, I have not read any of it, but I am hearing lots of spin from both sides.  The pro-government side is saying that lives could be endangered because of these leaks, but I have not heard any of them provide a single example.  The pro-Wikileaks side seems to claim that this information helps people to see the corruption in government and that it proves that the actions of our government with respect to foreign policy are indefensible.  I would say that there was already plenty of evidence of this before the leaks and that it is generally wrong to steal classified information.  However, as I said before, if leaks can be used to show that illegal actions were taken by our government, then I believe that it is justified to release those portions.   So if corruption committed by individuals within our government can be brought to light as result of the leaks, then I think those individuals should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  The release of the information may or may not be a net good or net bad, but since we can’t put the genie back into the bottle, we may as well make the best of it and use the information to educate the American people about the inappropriate conduct of particular individuals so that they are never elected again.  But it is clear to me that the main motivation of those in our government wanting to prosecute Assange is to preserve their reputations, not for the benefit of the American people.  I believe that they will try to make Assange a scapegoat for everything thing that goes wrong.  Democrats and Republicans will blame each other for allowing the information to be leaked.  The question is, will Americans see through this and will it further the trend toward blind loyalty to either party? 

It should be pointed out that the contents of the leaks are not just about American actions either.  Assange appears intent on exposing corruption wherever he can find it.  It is not all directed at the United States or its allies, which could be a key fact relevant to the question motive in any case brought against him. 

I condemn the sabotaging of websites by both our government and the adherents of Julian Assange.  Paypal, Mastercard, and Visa didn’t do anything wrong, so the supporters of Wikileaks have no right under common law to commit this act of destruction of property.  Assange’s websites should not be taken down until it is proven the he violated the law.  The principle of innocent until proven guilty should be preserved.

Whether or not the charges of rape are really true, Assange is a fornicator.  He admitted having sex with the two Swedish women on consecutive nights, but claims that it was consensual.  Even if his claim is true, he is definitely not someone who I would hold up as a banner of goodness and light. 

In conclusion, I believe that this Wikileaks episode is basically a conflict between forces, none of which possesses the moral high ground.  I do not think Christians should be parading Manning, Assange, Obama, our military, or anyone but Jesus Christ as a Banner of Salvation.  He is the only real Savior in this world.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Did Grandma get run over by a reindeer, or was it ObamaCare?

Forget the reindeer--- Granny got run over by ObamaCare! ---!/1_Conservatie

Two of the more salient lines in this parody are these:

"... But with fifty million uninsured its come down to her (Grandma) and an illegal named Jorge! ..."


"... While thy may not cover Grandma, they'll cover every pregnant teen who will abort ..."

Thanks to Dr. David Berwick and HHS welcome back death panels ... Goodbye Grandma!

The incredible shrinking president

Cartoon by Jeff Stahler in Columbus Dispatch originally published 7/30/10


This cartoon by Jeff Stahler says it all, does it not? It was featured this past weekend on page I-15 in Sunday's (12/26/2010) Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch newspaper. My, how you've shrunk Mr. President in popularity and status. You have been a controversial and an increasingly unpopular President.

You have proven to be an unexceptional leader and first and foremost a true socialist ideologue.  You and your agenda have been rejected by a large number of voters in the November General Election. Despite that rejection, you and your radical Democratic-led Congress have insisted on continuing to pursue that ungodly, socialistic agenda until the very last minute of the 111th Congress. From the standpoint of Karl Marx you have been highly successful. However, George Washington would have considered you an absolute abject failure. 

This president has been an outstanding success in his own eyes. His puppet master George Soros must be pleased overall with the advances made by this radical leftist and his capitalist, union, congressional cronies, media moguls, educational elites, and assorted government bureaucrats. However, an increasing number of Americans, both those who voted for him and those who did not vote for him, both now feel he is taking the nation in the wrong direction. The Tea Party Movement is an outgrowth of President Bush's and President Soetoro aka Obama's failed policies along with the last two  Democratic controlled Congresses. 

This nation must be righted. The ship is listing badly to the left and has been for quite some time. Our true hope is in personal and national repentance and in the recognition again of the sovereignty of the one true  God. Hopefully, He will use the new Congressional conservatives to get this sinking ship uprighted, turned around and headed in the right direction. We need to do it quickly or we will all surely drown ... 

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Mosques Mask Mischief & Mayhem

No Ground Zero Mosque? Yes, no more mosques, period!

Bryan Fischer this past August (August 10, 2010)  wrote an excellent article, "No more mosques, period,” on RightlyConcerned, a blog of the American Family Association. Hat tip goes to K.C. who had forwarded to me a link to that article. I reproduce which, for me, were some of the high points of this highly insightful However, I must warn you that the article is justifiably very politically incorrect, and very truthful.

"Permits should not be granted to build even one more mosque in the United States of America, let alone the monstrosity planned for Ground Zero. This is for one simple reason: each Islamic mosque is dedicated to the overthrow of the American government. 
"Each one is a potential jihadist recruitment and training center, and determined to implement the “Grand Jihad” of which Andy McCarthy has written...
"Because of this subversive ideology, Muslims cannot claim religious freedom protections under the First Amendment. They are currently using First Amendment freedoms to make plans to destroy the First Amendment altogether. There is no such thing as freedom of religion in Islam, and it is sheer and utter folly for Americans to delude themselves into thinking otherwise…
'The $100 million mosque on Ground Zero, a $100 million memorial to the glorious Muslim martyrs of 9/11 and built to celebrate the glorious conquest of Allah on that day, will almost certainly be built with lots and lots of Saudi money.
"The mosque’s imam, Faisal Rauf, will soon launch a fund-raising tour for this monument to slaughter in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Dubai. Even worse, American taxpayers are paying for this elaborate money-grubbing tour, money Rauf intends to use to destroy this nation from within. It’s hard to imagine anything more grotesque.
"Rauf refuses to condemn Hamas, and has said that America was an “accessory” to what  happened on 9/11. …
"Bottom line: it’s suicidal for America to allow terrorist training cells to crop up all over the fruited plain. And each mosque is an actual or potential terrorist training cell, as Anwar al-Awlaki has demonstrated. His north Virginia mosque was used to radicalize three of the 9/11 jihadis as well as the Major Hasan who shot up the infidel idolaters at Fort Hood…  
"American Muslims are being radicalized every single day in American mosques. We are sowing the seeds of our own destruction by allowing these improvised explosive devices to be established in community after community…"

You can read the enter blog entry here.

Monday, December 27, 2010

Ambassador John Bolton Eyes White House Run in 2012

I was initially excited when I read a news note, which had been emailed to me, about former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton's consideration of running for the GOP nomination for President in 2012 …

“Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, who never has held elective office, says he is seriously considering running for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012.““As I survey the situation, I think the Republican field is wide open,” Bolton told Politico
“I don’t think the party’s anywhere close to a decision. And stranger things have happened. For example, inexperienced senators from Illinois have gotten presidential nominations,” he added, alluding to Barack Obama’s presidential success.
"Bolton’s strength would be in foreign policy and national security, given his history with the U.N., the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the State Department under both presidents Bush…
“He favors shrinking the federal government, opposes abortion except in cases of rape or incest, and supports legalizing [same-sex] marriage and the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.””

Unfortunately, to me Bolton disqualifies himself with his less than 100% pro-life position and his support for two pillars of the homosexual agenda. I could not vote for him no matter how good he might be in other areas such as reducing the size of government and his very strong foreign affairs experience . .. 

How the Obama Stole Christmas!

Hat tip goes to Floyd Brown who sent me an email with a link to the video below. The video was presented by the I transcribed the words of this poem following the YouTube video. There is a lot of truth in this timely childish story about a new Grinch this Christmas season.

The Obama Who Stole Christmas

In Whoville today there is no celebrating
Your Grinch was converted, but there is a new one waiting

If you're a rich Who, then you have enough
Obama will come to take the rest of the stuff

Christmas was saved the last time around
But nothing is safe, when Obama comes to town

For ObamaCare we will borrow and add to the debt
The little Whos will pay, for that you can bet

Obama and Keynes say government must stimulate
He spends and he spends yet unemployment remains above eight

Most Whos would like jobs so they could work for a living
But Obama says, “No, I will just keep on giving.”

More money from China, I will continue to borrow
For this, I am sure, will relieve your sorrow

The Whos in Whoville have nothing to save
Their money to the government they already gave

If you thought your money was yours to spend
The new Grinch has said, that must end

What you make is not yours, it’s the governments, you see
Obama will take it for his spending spree

But Whos are wondering, what is the purpose of this spending?
Is there a chance in the future of any of this ending?

Or shall we tax and tax and tax some more?
Then spend it all, ‘til everyone is poor?

But Whos in Whoville finally got tough
Stood up and declared, “We have had enough.”

We the people of Whoville, or the Tea Party participants, are expecting the 112th Congress, which will have a stronger conservative element, to halt the Grinch's spending spree and to reverse his disastrous Keynesian economic policies. We expect the new Congress to create a realistic budget that reduces spending dramatically and that begins to reduce the great deficit ...

Sunday, December 26, 2010

The Whole Armor of God, Part 6

Today I continue my series of articles commenting on the concept and principles involved in the Armor of God, which the apostle Paul described in the New Testament. This is the topic of the Sunday school lesson I am currently teaching.

The Armor of God - Truth

1. Truth: Having your loins gird about with truth (Ephesians 6:14).

Truth is reality. It is not determined by what you believe. Either you believe truth or you believe non-truth (fiction). People must correctly judge truth from non-truth. The Holy Spirit, through the Apostle Paul, is showing truth to be like a belt used in the military on which other equipment is kept.

For something to be logical it has to be based on truth. Reasoning that is not based on truth is illogical. Fiction in an argument makes the argument illogical. If you base your life on something other than truth at some point you will fail. The United States of America put men on the moon and brought them back to earth safely. This required the correct knowing of the truth of physics, chemistry, and navigation as well as working within its confines.      .

A. Know what the truth is.

Jesus is the Truth.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

John 8:32” “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

John 8:36: “ If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
Know and believe that Jesus is the Son of God. That He took your sins and everyone else’s in his own body on the cross and received the wrath of God against himself for those sins (I Peter 2:24).

Repent of your sins and invite Jesus into your heart if you have not done so yet (Luke 24:47).

B. Love the truth.

In II Thessalonians we read that those who do not love the truth will have drastic consequences in the future which will last forever.

II Thessalonians 2:6-10: “And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming. Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders. And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.”

C. People forsake their own mercy by believing lying vanities.

Jonah 2:8: A vanity is something that is useless, empty, and without substance. A lying vanity is something that useless and not true. It appears to be true when it is not. A mirage would fall into the category. All the world’s religions except Christianity would fall into this category. Someone who has the truth would not believe a lying vanity.

D. God desires truth in the inward being.

Truth needs to be internalized within a person. This can be accomplished through scripture memory, thinking about scripture, reading God’s word and listening to good preaching and teaching.

Psalm 51:6: “Behold, thou desirest truth in the inward parts: and in the hidden part thou shalt make me to know wisdom.”

E. Do truth.

Jesus says that doing what He says will enable a person to encounter the difficulties in life without being destroyed. King David writes that by obeying .God's word a person is rewarded.

Mathew 7:24-27: “Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.”

Psalm 19:7-11 “The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward.

F. Recognize who a person is in Christ.

The person who is has the truth in Christ knows that they are a saint, set apart for God and a part of the body of Christ. They have assurance of salvation and know they are going to heaven. By having believed in Jesus a person becomes a new creature and the righteousness of God in Christ.

Luke 7:28: “For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than is greater than he. Each and every Christian is then greater than John the Baptist.”

II Corinthians 5:17: “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.”John the Baptist: but he that is least in the kingdom of God.

2 Corinthians 5:21: “For He hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.”

A response to recent NRSC solicitation

Here is a copy of the note I sent to Senator John Cornyn this week in response to his solicitation for funds for the National Republican Senatorial Campaign.

December 21, 2010

National Republican Senatorial Committee
Ronald Reagan Republican Center
425 2nd Street NE
Washington, DC 20002

Dear Senator John Cornyn

With the help of Republican Senators the Senate voted for open homosexuality in the military. I am appalled and consider myself betrayed by those in office. No longer will I give to the Republican Party.

According to the Bible, homosexuality is a crime worthy of death. Since America has chosen to accept it as being okay, now it is America that will die.

You have God's word on that!



Saturday, December 25, 2010

A digitized account of the Nativity

Hat tip goes to!/KOSMOSNET  for just posting a link to this modern day version of the birth of Jesus Christ.  Merry CHRISTmas one and all.

Jihad Bells, Jihad Bells, Jihad all the way!

Hat tip goes to blogger NewZeal for this Christmas Day post with an Islamic slant, "Jihad Bells." It pokes fun at the so-called religion of peace and its radical proponents' perspective on Christianity. It is anything but tolerant and understanding!

Friday, December 24, 2010

What is the top Civil Rights issue today?

Is it Amnesty for Illegals? Is it granting homosexuals special privileges and rights? Is it granting Muslims special religious accommodations? Or is it permitting Same Sex ‘Marriage’? No, it is none of these. Dr. Alveda King, niece of slain Civil Rights’ leader Martin Luther King, Jr., identifies the foremost civil rights issue of the day in the YouTube video below. Hat tip goes to!/AlvedaKing for her recent tweet in which she provided the link to this video below.

King closes her remarks in this video revealing what is the most important civil rights’ issue of the day, “…I want to remind you that the babies (being aborted) are lights, too, and they have life. So as we choose life, then we give life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to ALL people. And that is really THE civil rights issue of the day! ...”

Hey, Big Sis, ‘If not now, when?’

Hat tip goes to for their article, "If not now, when?", which they emailed me. This article clearly delineates the problem of illegal immigration. It discusses the senseless, needless death of another U.S. Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry, who was murdered last week while on duty.

… He was murdered in the line of duty. He was trailing bandits in the lawless desert area of Arizona. That particular area is lawless because our Federal government will not protect the border or enforce our laws.
Agent Terry was taken back to Detroit to be laid to rest. In what can only be described as a brazen act of Chutzpah, Homeland Security Clown in Chief Janet Napolitano attended the funeral and met with the family.
Under ordinary circumstances, that would be the decent thing to do. Our circumstances are not ordinary.
Agent Terry’s father, Kent Terry told Napolitano to “wake your man up in the White House.” To which Napolitano is reported to have said, he has done more in two years than any other president. I really doubt anyone would have faulted the man for decking her right then and there.
The Terry family has justifiably complained that the government has done nothing to secure the border and by extension, Brian Terry’s death was not only needless but avoidable. They are right.
The media accosted the Clown of Homeland Security after the funeral and asked her about the Terry family’s anger over this. Napolitano said, this isn’t the time to talk about this issue.
If not now, when?
The answer is, the time is never. The Obama regime does not want to talk about this issue. They do not want to talk about the fact they refuse to secure the border. They do not want to talk about the fact they do not enforce our immigration laws. They do not want to talk about the fact they want to grant amnesty to twenty or thirty million illegal aliens, despite the fact Americans overwhelmingly object to this.
This regime does not care about what the American people want.
...the blood of United States Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and a lot of other Americans is on the hands of Obama, Napolitano and the other members of his regime.
Those are tough words, but the problem is, the Obama regime does not care.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

A Monumental Failure

Cartoon by William Warren as found at on 12/23/2010

Doesn't this cartoon say it all? The President and the 111th Congress took us in the opposite direction of that of the first President did. We must reverse the damage done the last two years. We must curb the appetite of an obese government. That government must back off of trying to curb the appetite of fat American children. Instead, government must be put on a diet. It must begin to do what it was designed to do, and only what is enumerated in the Constitution - defend the nation from our enemies - Islamic terrorists out the nation and socialist infiltrators and propagandists within the government.