Tuesday, July 31, 2007

The Homosexual Agenda, Part 2

The Homosexual Agenda is Here and it is Clear

There definitely is a homosexual agenda. It is multifaceted and it has been and is a very effective. That does not at all mean that that it is a good thing, however. On the contrary, it is wholly harmful on a number of fronts. Today we will identify some of the strongest supporters. Then we will continue to unwrap this devastating plan. Next to the abortion atrocity, it is the most wicked movement in our nation today.


Teaming up homosexual activists are anti-American, anti-Christan amoral organizational and individual culprits bent on destroying America and its values. These culprits include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Planned (really preventing) Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), the National Education Association (NEA), and the National Organization of Women (NOW), Hollywood, academia and much of the mainstream media. There is a whole host of homosexual groups such as GLESN, GLADD, etc. all purporting to represent homosexuals, lesbians, and bisexual and transgender individuals.


Through accomplices such as East Coast liberal Senator Edward Kennedy and San Francisco politician Speaker Nancy “I am the most powerful woman in the world” Pelosi, the homosexual activists are even seeking “special” rights, classification and protections beyond those accorded the typical American citizen under the U.S. Constitution. So-called “hate crimes” and “anti-discrimination” laws would have ultimate two-fold effect of elevating homosexuality to not only a protected status, but also setting in motion the silencing of true Christians’ free expression of absolute Biblical truth in regard to the basic immorality of homosexuality, as well as other sexual perversions. This silencing of all opposition is also part of the homosexual agenda.

The GOP is not innocent. Mayor Rudy and Governor Mitt seem to be riding the fence on their support for the homosexual agenda. When it is convenient they apparently support the homosexual agenda. Their words do not match their past actions. That is why I do not trust these two candidates.


Vitagliano in the article that I mentioned yesterday. quotes Paula Ettelbrick, who is the executive director of the International [Homosexual] and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, as having once stated: “Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so . . . Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family, and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. . . . We must keep our eyes on the goal . . . of radically reordering society’s view of reality.”


The homosexual activist will not settle for “tolerance” of their immorality, or mere “acceptance”, they want to have the stamp of approval on their perversion. What better way to claim the “right” to the privilege and benefits of “legalized” marriage? It is totally absurd to even attempt to compare perversion with the natural order. Unfortunately, this is what moral blindness does to you. Marriage is reserved as the exclusive and sacred domain of one man and one woman. Every American is free to marry anyone of the opposite sex assuming appropriateness of age and who is not already married. I believe that neither civil union nor domestic partnership should have any of the privileges or rights reserved for one-man, one woman lawful marriage. To corrupt he definition of marriage is to insult the natural family and is destructive to any society. It is a preposterous affront to society to demand marital rights for anyone but a married man and woman.


Furthermore, another important part of the homosexual agenda includes government school indoctrination of our children in the acceptability and normality and appropriateness of homosexual lifestyle and behavior at the earliest ages. Homosexuality is just another viable (actually it is a vile) alternative lifestyle worth consideration, recognition and honor. Brainwashing our children, often in direct opposition to the teaching of their parents, and done stealthily so that parents do not even know that it is happening.

Tomorrow we will conclude this three part series with some ways we can help stem the overwhelming tide and advancement of this hideous agenda.

Stay tuned for more

Monday, July 30, 2007

The Homosexual Agenda, Part 1

Their Agenda Assaults American Values

This article, in part is a response to Deniselle’s comment to my
article yesterday, she writes “. . . maybe you should explain HOW exactly homosexual marriages threaten the marriages between men and women, and what this "homosexual agenda" might be. I'm in a lesbian relationship . . . The only thing I want, and I'm sure I'm speaking for most homosexuals here, is to be accepted the way I am. This goal in no way contradicts heterosexual marriages, unless the heterosexual marriage is based on the premise of destroying others' possibilities to marry.”

Well, Deniselle, here goes.

“Spurred by self-assertive activists and aided by the liberal establishment, homosexuals have created a movement that may be more influential and more aggressive than anything this nation has ever seen,” writes Ed Vitagliano in the July 2007 issue of the American Family Association Journal (www.afajournal.org). He is right. This masterful manipulative moneyed minority is successfully and aggressively attacking some of America’s most basic core cultural values – one man, one woman traditional marriage and the natural family unit, common decency and is doing so relentlessly.


A very keystone event on the road toward their ultimate justification of their very unhealthy, immoral, unnatural and abnormal lifestyle and behavior was the coup they pulled off when they got the American Psychiatric Association to arbitrarily declare that homosexuality is no longer a mental disorder, therefore is no longer abnormal. One day it is abnormal, then presto, Abbra Cadabbra!!!!, normal! Wow, great balls of fire, what a miracle. This was the beginning of the downward spiral descending toward the incremental destruction of our once great nation.


Building on the lie that homosexuality is not abnormal, social “junk scientists” and homosexual activists advanced the notion that homosexuality is genetic and began the frantic search for a non-existent gene. No, they will never find it. Homosexuality is due to a large extent on environmental upbringing and possible abuse by a trusted relative, family friend, teacher, a neighbor, clergy or a peer. Perhaps the child had an encounter with a pedophile or other sexual predators. Furthermore, another key component is choice. Individuals ultimately choose how they will behave. Homosexuals, adulterers or thieves can all change their behavior. Additionally, homosexuals cannot reproduce so they must recruit to “breed.”


Vitagliano asks, “So what is it that homosexual activists want from society? Simply put, the overarching goal of the (homosexual) movement is to obtain society’s approval of homosexuality.” They don’t merely want to be tolerated. Perhaps to be tolerated may have been the first phase of their strategy. However now they want it all. They want approval, total acceptance of their perverse lifestyle and immoral behavior. This goes beyond what Deniselle longing to be “accepted for who I am.” I can love and accept you as a human being, but I do not have to condone or approve your behavior. Your behavior remain reprehensible. We can accept every individual as precious in God’s sight, but we should never accept or condone immoral, unnatural and unhealthy behavior.

Tomorrow we will conclude this article with a discussion of so-called "hate crime", the attempt to redefine marriage, child indoctrination in the homosexual lifestyle, etc., all of which are a part of the homosexual agenda.

To be continued

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Top Ten TV Sponsors of Homosexuality

It’s Time to Vote with our Dollars!

We gave kudos to one traditional American company, Sears, for their support of our troops on Friday. Today we must point out the top ten companies that support the culture-corrupting homosexual agenda through their sponsorship of television programming.

The biggest, most flagrant, most pompous, most blatant culprit in "driving" the homosexual agenda on televsion is the Ford Motor Company. Ford is not my father’s company anymore. My dad purchased his first and most of his subsequent cars from Ford. He wouldn’t think of purchasing a foreign product. I have never purchased a Ford product, and at this point, never will. Why? In its increasing sponsorship of homosexual activities on television and elsewhere, it has become a “foreign” contra-American company, it has alienated itself from and has positioned itself to be in opposition to traditional American values. It is being used wittingly or unwittingly as an instrument to the corruption of our culture.


The American Family Association (AFA) recently sent me some information explaining their opposition to the homosexual agenda, “Our opposition to the homosexual agenda is a POLITICAL and SOCIAL opposition based on Biblical principles. So when we speak against homosexuality, we do so without self-righteousness.” At this time the only company that AFA is officially calling to boycott on the list below is Ford.

Top 10 Pro-Homosexual Sponsors on Television

1. Ford Motor Company Ford cars and trucks, Mazda, Jaguar, Lincoln Mercury cars & minivans, Volvo cars.

2. Toyota Motor Company
Camry, Corolla, Tacoma, Lexus

3. AT&T Corporation Wireless & Internet service, Cingular, Blackjack phone, long distance phone service

4. Procter & Gamble
Bounty, Clairol, Tide, Crest Toothpaste, CoverGirl, Gillette, Folgers, Downy etc

5. Revlon
Revlon branded beauty products

6. GlaxoSmithKline
Abreva, Advair, Aquafress, Boniva, Nicoderm

7. Uniliever
Degree, Dove, Slim-Fast, Snuggles, Suave, Sunsilk

8. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Dodge, Mercedes, Jeep, Ram trucks

9. Verizon Communications

10. The Quaker Oats Company
Gatorade, cereals, oatmeal


In attacking marriage between one man and one woman, homosexuality tears at the very fabric of society. Ask the companies to reconsider their sponsorship of such programs as Ugly Betty (ABC), Grey's Anatomy (ABC) and The Office (NBC).
Therefore, first, I encourage readers to boycott Ford until they change their TV sponsorship of pro-homosexual programs and in lieu, to purchase products from General Motors. Additionally, please strive to purchase all you can from the competitors of any of the other companies shown on the above list. For example, for the past several years I have stopped purchasing Crest Toothpaste, a Procter & Gamble product, and have purchased Colgate Toothpaste instead, precisely because of the Cincinnati-based company's commitment to and long-standing support of the culture-killing homosexual agenda.

Secondly, before the end of summer please contact each of the top ten companies and voice the fact that you do not appreciate their sponsorship of TV programs that honor or promote the homosexual lifestyle and the corrupting influence that it has on our children and society.. Each of the companies named above is hyperlinked with contact information to make it easy for you to tell them what you think . . .
Finally, please sign the AFA's petition supporting the boycott of Ford Motor Company automobiles until Ford stops supporting homosexual groups which are pushing homosexual marriage.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

Evan Almighty (2007)

Do you want to watch an enjoyable, engaging, wholesome movie this summer? I usually wait the 18 months and rent or buy the DVD. However, when Dave Zanotti of the American Policy Roundtable and Public Square Radio Show, which I listen to as often as I can, made this movie a must-see recommendation, I knew that I had to watch it.. Furthermore, I was not at all disappointed in the Friday afternoon matinee presentation. I chilled in the theater on this muggy sizzling summer day.

Please see Evan Almighty which is sequel of sort to Bruce Almighty. Except for Morgan Freeman playing God, nothing else is similar between the two movies with the same surname. Bruce Almighty at best may be a 1 star out five. Bruce Almighty was all about Jim Carrey. Evan Almighty was all about the story. Evan Almighty is 5 times better!
I am not familiar with the actor who played the lead role of Congressman Evan Baxter, but I know Morgan Freeman, who played God (much better that Mr. George Burns did I might add), John Goodman, Roseanne Barr’s TV husband played the corrupt (what else is new?) Congressman Long and one of TV’s Gilmore Girls played Baxter’s wife, and Mr. Parker from the Pretender TV show, which is my all-time favorite TV show, played minor role as another Congressman.

Evan Baxter is a TV anchor from Buffalo NY who runs for and wins a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Baxter’s campaign slogan is “Change the World.” which as the movie progresses, he gets a chance to fulfill. We also get a glimpse at politicians (John Goodman's Rep. Long) at their worst.

It is a light-hearted comedy with a message (imagine that!). Anyone who regularly follows the machinations of the politics will thoroughly enjoy this movie. Above all it shows God in a positive light, so rare in these days of ACLU“Americans” United for the Separation of Church and State” or the People for the “American” Way – persistently purging Him from the campus, government and the public square.

Without giving away more of the movie the movie involves the rookie Congressman, moving to Washington DC. As the plot progresses he comes to be referred to as the “New York Noah” by the main-stream media as he goes on to follow God’s direction. The movie reminded me of another of my favorite TV shows Joan of Arcadia, the teenager who talked to the various manifestations of God. Joan of Arcadia had a short two-year run, it was too good for American TV, I guess . . .

This is a must see movie for anyone interested in politics, a wonderful movie for the whole family. I’d make it required viewing for every American Christian and Christian families! Enjoy! People actually clapped at the end of the movie! How often does that happen and nobody left early. Be sure to stay during the credits for the incredible dance scene, too!


Join me in making a statement with our wallets. Support good movies, see Evan Almighty. Then, just maybe movie makers will make more inspiring flicks instead of producing the toxic filth, which is not even fit for the sewer, currently the fare too often served up by Hollywood culture-corrupting elites.


gregjaye's movie rating: ***** out of *****

Friday, July 27, 2007

Bottled Politicians

High Priced Ordinary Tap Water?

An AOL news article about deceitful marketing practices of water bottlers caught my attention this evening. Much like pretty flashy fancy bottled water containers, filled with ordinary tap water, are politicians who for the most part filled with bluster.

They come with $400 haircuts, facelifts, pretty packages all wrapped in promises and postulates. However, they are lacking in leadership and lacking in principled action above all.

Also, just like those empty plastic bottles they fill up space in our landfills and in Congress. Quite an apt analogy I would say.

Sears' Sure Support of American Troops

Here is some truly wonderful, positive news from an otherwise Wal-Mart-dominated profit-is-god world of globalized corporate greed, bottom-line mentality. This email was sent to us by T.D., a friend of this blog. It is a breath of fresh air. Here is a light in the darkness.

“Sears... I know I needed this reminder since Sears isn't always my first choice. Amazing when you think of how long the war has lasted and they haven't withdrawn from their commitment. Could we each buy at least one thing at Sears this year?

How does Sears treat its employees who are called up for military duty? By law, they are required to hold their jobs open and available, but nothing more. Usually, people take a big pay cut and lose benefits as a result of being called up. Sears is voluntarily paying the difference in salaries and maintaining all benefits, including medical insurance and bonus programs, for all called up reservist employees for up to two years.

“I submit that Sears is an exemplary corporate citizen and should be recognized for its contribution. I suggest we all shop at Sears, and be sure to find a manager to tell them why we are there so the company gets the positive reinforcement it well deserves.

“Pass it on.

“(I) decided to check this before I sent (the above message) forward. So I sent the following e-mail to the Sears Customer Service Department:

"I received this e-mail and I would like to know if it is true. If it is, the Internet may have just become one very good source of advertisement your company. I know I would go out of my way to buy products from Sears instead of another store for a like item, even if it's cheaper at that store.

"This is their answer to my e-mail:

Dear Customer:

Thank you for contacting Sears. The information is factual. We appreciate your positive feedback.

Sears regards service to our country as one of greatest sacrifices our young men and women can make. We are happy to do our part to lessen the burden they bear at this time.

Bill Thorn
Sears Customer Care

“Please pass this on to all your friends. Sears needs to be recognized this outstanding contribution and we need to show them as Americans, we do appreciate what they are doing for our military!!!

“It's verified ! By Snopes.com at:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/sears.asp (shows the entire article) checked this out at Snopes also and it is true.”

I am glad to reprint and pass on this good news . . . Support Sears, which supports our troops! Three cheers for Sears!

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Beyond the June 28th Victory

The recent hubbub about how unfair this Fairness Doctrine is has got me thinking. Not only is it a good thing that this ridiculous legislation has been stopped, but also what is already in place should be. It is already the case that radio and TV broadcasters must broadcast particular opinions whether they like it or not. This forcing of opinions comes in the form legislation that requires broadcasters to accept commercials for political campaigns.

Here are two examples:

A Christian radio station in Cincinnati, WAKW, was forced run ads for a very liberal candidate (Victoria Wulsun) for Congress who believes that “marriage is a wonderful document that should be available to two people of the same sex”. The radio station got plenty of calls from angry listeners, despite the fact that DJs repeatedly said that the radio station did not endorse this candidate and that they were being forced to play the ads. The ads did not say anything about Ms. Wulsun’s liberal positions, but only vague statements about believing in God, peace, love, and trying to get along with everyone.

A secular radio station was forced to run ads for another congressional candidate (Jim Condit, Jr.) from Ohio’s second district. Mr. Condit’s ad proclaimed that the Jews were responsible for happened on September 11th. (He says that they used remote controls.) Mr. Condit also believes that the Halocaust never really happened.

Why should anyone be forced to promote such views? It is unfair to the other candidates to give every candidate an automatic ticket to whatever advertising venue they want. It is also unfair to radio, TV, and other advertisers to be forced to promote a view that would damage its reputation with its particular audience. For the same reason, no taxpayer’s money should be used to pay for political campaigns either.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Will Memorial be a Crescent-Shaped Insult?

A proposal for the memorial (2007?)


Muslim Crescent

Model of Flight 93 memorial (2005)

United flight 93 was one of the commercial airplanes that was hijacked by Moslem terrorists but crashed before the terrorists accomplished their mission due to the valor of some of its American passengers I read an exclusive WorldNetDaily.com article, “Flight 93 memorial: 'Giant mosque' today. It was about the memorial that is being designed and built to mark the site of the crash and to apparently honor the Americans who fought to save the flight from being a weapon in the hands of the terrorists to strike the Capital Building or White House. Check out the movie review I wrote about the movie United 93.
It is something that is not being talked about at all in the main stream media, so that alone caught my attention. The article alleges that according Alec Rawls' the author of a new book, "Crescent of Betrayal: Dishonoring the Heroes of Flight 93,” the planned crescent-shaped "memorial to heroes" of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania is nothing less than a huge outdoor mosque that pays homage to Islam and Islamic terrorists.

As I read this incredible allegation, it struck me as absurd and I thought is it possible? Who was financing this memorial? Was it Saudi Arabia? Was this just a big mix-up? Was the author just making things up in order to peddle his book?

The article quoted something Representative and Republican Presidential candidate Tom Tancredo commented in 2005, “Regardless of whether or not the invocation of a Muslim symbol by the memorial designer was intentional or not, it seems that such a symbol is unsuitable for paying appropriate tribute to the heroes of Flight 93 or the ensuing American struggle against radical Islam that their last historic act and the 'Let's Roll' effort has come to symbolize."

The article also quoted Pastor Ron McRae, head of the Bible Anabaptist Church in Jerome, PA which is located 55 miles from Pittsburgh as having said in September of 2005, "This is a memorial to the terrorists who killed those people, not a memorial to the folks who died there innocently,"

This is another case of political correctness run amok. As I read in one of the articles, what an outcry there would be if God's 10 commandments or the cross of Jesus Christ would be part of the memorial. Yet either the intentional or unintentiall use of the Islamic crescent you hear nary a peep.

Read the WND article for yourself and make a comment i you would like.

The Church, Government and Democracy

"We need religion as a guide. We need it because we are imperfect, and our government needs the church, because only those humble enough to admit they’re sinners can bring to democracy the tolerance it requires in order to survive."

– President Ronald Reagan

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Dog Gone QB Vick, But What About Planned Parenthood?

Isn’t it ironic that famous NFL quarterback Michael Vick, pictured on the left, gets ostracized and punished for killing mere dogs, while the infamous and wicked Planned Parenthood Federation of America gets rewarded for killing babies? “What’s up with that?” I ask.

The media is all a twitter over the alleged cruelty perpetrated on a few neighbor stray dogs by Atlanta Falcons star quarterback Michael Vick. Sure it is not right TO abuse any creature. But, I cannot get very excited or upset about it while 4,000 HUMAN BEINGS are being systematically destroyed in various ways in abortion chambers and so-called “reproductive health clinics” throughout America this very day. Where is our perspective? Where is our sense of decency? It is all political Correctness run amok. Just weeks earlier the Planned (really “Preventing”) Parenthood Federation of America, whose main mission is the killing of America’s children, received an increase in funding from the Congress. Isn’t something wrong with this picture? Clearly!

Journalist Bill Wilson in his Daily Jot article today quoted his friend, Dr. Alveda King, niece of the late Dr. Martin Luther King. Wilson says that Dr. (Alveda) King makes a good point about the media frenzy surrounding the Vick dog fight indictment. She says, "The appalling cruelty to dogs described in the complaint against Michael Vick immediately reminds me of another kind of cruelty that is not only not punished, but is protected by our authorities. I'm talking about the incredible cruelty suffered by babies who are stabbed, have limb torn from limb, or have their skulls crushed in the womb by abortionists. The pain these children endure is undoubtedly excruciating, yet we close our eyes and look the other way in the name of 'choice.'"

Dr. King certainly puts things in perspective. Life is a civil rights matter. Life is far more a civil rights matter, than the vociferous homosexual lobby who demand to be treated as a discriminated class such as blacks, woman disabled or aged. However, babies do not have many moneyed champions as do the homosexuals or abortionists: Hollywood, main stream media, the National Education Association (NEA), financiers George Soros and Tim Gill, and nearly all the current leaders of the Democrat Party! Babies have a right to live as much as any one of us. Let's work for obtaining their rights and stop wasting time considering the "rights" of people trying to justify their immoral, unnatural, unhealthy and abnormal behavior.

It is a crime against humanity when the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) gets more media attention, air time, accolades and devotion than does any pro-life organization or positive pro-life story. This is wrong. The value of one human life, even the tiniest baby, is intrinsically of more value and worth now and in eternity than all the dogs and animals on earth today. That is how far this nation has degenerated the past 50-60 years. Thanks to extremists animal “rights” activists along with their willing accomplices in academia and the media, our society is expected to value dogs and snail-darters more than we do our fellow human beings. This is frankly duplicitous, disgusting and disgraceful.

Monday, July 23, 2007

Personhood: When a Person is a Person

Human life begins at conception. We know much more about when life begins today in 2007, than apparently those seven “all-wise” US Supreme Court Justices did in 1973, when they admitted that they did not know when life precisely began. However that did not deter them from deciding what has proved to be one of the worst decision in human history – which has led to the blatant extermination of nearly 50 million precious human beings the past 34 years. I’d say that was a costly, careless and critical misjudgment. Actually is an on-going American holocaust, an American atrocity!

Anyone looking at an ultrasound of a pregnant woman’s developing baby can obviously see what liberally-blinded, abortion-at-all-costs minded leftists cannot see – a vital, viable living human being. Just look at the impact that the Center for Bio-ethical Reform, or Missionaries to the Pre-Born, or the Survivors pro-life have on those who view pictures of aborted babies at various stages of development on their websites and in their efforts on the streets and campuses of America. Look at those pictures and say that those babies are not human beings!

Well pro-life organizations and advocates for thirty years have been dancing around the issue and trying to chip away incrementally at the terrible dreaded Roe v. Wade decision and even with 6 years with a alleged conservative, pro-life President and Congress very little has been accomplished. Powerful and dedicated organizations hell-bent on preserving at any and all costs a woman’s “right” to murder her unborn child such as the radical feminist National Organization of Women (NOW), the abortion industry’s chief lobbyist and representative the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) as well as the gruesome giant Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which promotes and provides the means, methods and manpower to kill the innocent babies. These are merely the headliners in the heinous pro-death amalgamation of liberal groups advocating for preserving and even expanding this wicked song and dance show.

Now comes some very positive news from out of the state of Colorado. There is a group working on a constitutional amendment which would declare the “personhood” of every unborn baby from the moment of conception. This amendment is progressing with the ultimate objective of being placed on the ballot and the people of Colorado being given an opportunity to vote of it in November of 2008. Below is the wording of the language of the amendment.

Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Colorado:

SECTION 1. Article II of the constitution of the state of Colorado is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION to read:

Section 31. Person defined. As used in sections 3, 6, and 25 of article II of the state constitution, the terms “person” or “persons” shall include any human being from the moment of fertilization.

This is the best solution. Mark Meuser, a spokesman for the Colorado Equal Rights, the organization heading up the amendment initiative, said in a WorldNetDaily.com article, “We’re defining when personhood begins. In this state, there would be no abortions.”

The WND article points out the “hole” in Roe v. Wade that the Colorado Equal Rights is targeting is the little-publicized comment from Justice Harry Blackmun, author of the 1973 opinion, win which he noted, “[if the’ suggestion of personhood [for the unborn’ is established, the [abortion rights] case, of course collapse, for the fetus’ [baby’s] right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment.”

Mr. Meuser also noted in the WND article that his state was the first to legalize abortion. He is quoted as saying, “We should be the first state to turn around and acknowledge our mistake and grant personhood to the unborn.”

It is also interesting to note that there has been some controversy within the pro-life movement itself in Colorado. The National Right to Life organization kicked the Colorado Right to Life chapter out of their group. From what I could surmise it was because of the tough stand that Brian Rohrbacher, the leader of Colorado Right to Life took in admonished Dr. James Dobson, Focus on the Family and other pro-life organizations as making a big deal out of the recent Partial Birth Abortion Ban, when Rohrbacher thinks it will not actually save one human beings life, since abortionists will just use another means to kill the baby and not chance losing the revenue or opportunity to kill.

Some very good things being initiated in Colorado these days . . .

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Governing for the Most People

I recently received a letter from President Bill Clinton seeking my financial support to advance the Democrat Party majority in the Senate. Obviously President Clinton was not aware that as a Democrat candidate, myself, in the 2006 primary election my positions were very conservative and almost totally contrary to those espoused by the Democrat Party elite then and now. Moreover, just as I did when the Republicans wrote to me asking me to contribute to their cause, I responded with a letter to the sender.

Dear President Clinton:

Thank you for your letter of June 25, 2007 requesting funds to help the Democrat senate campaigns.

You write of “governing in a way those benefits the most people” and which “ensures our successful future together.” “Governing for the common good,” you say. Five times you used that phrase in your letter. What ever happened to governing for everyone? Doesn’t the Declaration of Independence state, “ that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights”? Wasn’t the United States of America started for the benefit of all the people?

If you are only governing to benefit the most people; are you not governing at the expense of the some of the citizens? In other words, you seem to be advocating governing to hurt some. If you rob Peter to pay Paul and Andrew and who knows who else, then is not this governing to benefit the most people. You write about 8,000 people who would be affected for $250 billion of the death tax. Are you not hurting these people, their decedents, and their employees and employees’ families, not to mention the tax base that this $250 billion provides? You speak of college loans. Can’t people join the military and get an education by use of the G.I. benefit or low cost loan? Isn’t this a better way of supporting the country and the individual?

President Lyndon Johnson governed to help the majority with his Great Society welfare state program. What he did in essence was lock people into dependence on the government and made them unable to take care of themselves? Who was really helped under this grand welfare scheme?

Another Democrat President, Jimmy Carter, removed the United States from Panama. Now our enemy Red China controls both ends of the Panama Canal. He oversaw the end of the Shah in Iran and brought about the modern terrorist state and allowed American hostages to be held 444 days doing essentially nothing to gain their release.

Mr. Clinton, as President, you vetoed the ban on partial birth abortion, ordered the attack on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, which was eventually set on fire. Was this a trial run on how the government should effectively deal with Christians? Furthermore, in Somalia you sent troops to do a job, but not enough back-up of men and equipment was provided when they ran into trouble. Then you abruptly pulled the military out when some of our people got killed. This emboldened the terrorists to further attack the United States. China couldn’t get their rockets to work properly, so you allowed an American firm to go and assist them. Then China used this American given knowledge to target America with nuclear warheads.

I am really amused that you imply the Democrat Party would govern for a successful future. President Bush tried to increase oil drilling, approve the building of new refineries, and new nuclear power plants. The Democrats in Congress foiled this. President John F. Kennedy said the way to increase revenue to the U.S. Treasury is to decrease taxes, which in turn stimulates the economy. You and the Democrat Party leadership advocate increasing taxes, increase spending, shrink or even deplete the military, not have an anti-missile system and lose wars. It is woefully apparent that the Democrats desire the destruction of America for the Party’s ideas and polices are self-destructive. President Clinton, perhaps God has given you up to a deprived mind, you and your Party call evil good and good evil.

President F. D. Roosevelt spoke of experiment. America is not an experiment. Our Forefathers were Christians who knew the living God through faith in Jesus Christ. They lived in obedience to him. Liberty’s source is the Spirit of God. Obedience to God is what is needed and this benefits everyone. It appears that Democrats are opposed to God and do not want to live in obedience to Him. His judgment begins with climate change. This is followed by foreign harassment (i.e. terrorism). This is then followed by loss of sovereignty. If the people refuse to repent, then the nation is eliminated. Have you, sir, ever heard of Sodom and Gomorrah? They too refused to repent.

I strongly suggest, Mr. President that you repent of your sins, and personally invite Jesus Christ into your heart and life. A simple prayer would accomplish this, “Lord Jesus Christ, forgive me of my sins, and come into my heart and life today . . .


P.S.: Your request for my assistance in funding of any Democrat senatorial candidates or campaigns is denied for the reasons stated above.

Saturday, July 21, 2007

These Things I Believe, Too

I just read an excellent article by Chuck Baldwin titled, "Government Arrogance is Out of Control." He masterfully ended it with powerful quotation from Lyn Nofziger. The late Nofziger served as press secretary in the then California Governor Ronald Reagan’s administration and as a White House advisor during the Nixon and Reagan presidencies.

I added the capitalized titles to Noziger’s belief statements. I must say, except perhaps for his last statement, which was tongue in cheek, I would concur with most of Nofziger’s principled beliefs.


Franklyn "Lyn" Nofziger
(1924 - 2006)

· "That government should butt out.


· That freedom is our most precious commodity and if we are not eternally vigilant, government will take it all away.


· That individual freedom demands individual responsibility.


· That government is not a necessary good but an unavoidable evil.


· That the executive branch has grown too strong, the judicial branch too arrogant and the legislative branch too stupid.


· That political parties have become close to meaningless.


· That government should work to insure the rights of the individual, not plot to take them away.


· That government should provide for the national defense and work to insure domestic tranquility.


· That foreign trade should be fair rather than free.


· That America should be wary of foreign entanglements.


· That the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.


· That guns do more than protect us from criminals; more importantly, they protect us from the ongoing threat of government.


· That states are the bulwark of our freedom.

· That states should have the right to secede from the Union


· That once a year we should hang someone in government as an example to his fellows."

Note: These Things I Believe was originally published in the 11/9/99 issue of the Federalist Digest.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Three (Morally) Blinded Mice, See How They Run

The trio, Barrack Obama, Hillary Rodham-clinton and John Edwards, are nothing more than 2 bit radical leftist politicians who are hell-bent on destroying America and remaking it into the image of some sort of socialist atheistic communistic global utopia

The only reason Rudy Giuliani is not included with the other leftists is because of his position on the war on terror, and his apparent understanding of this nation’s enemies. However on social issues he could be easily lumped together with the three liberal elite named above. The social issues are the most critical to the life blood of a nation. The social issues define the heart and soul of a nation.

The things that unite these three or make that four is their unabashed belief in a woman’s unequivocal “right” to kill her unborn baby – abortion-on-demand. The three, make that four aforementioned also wholeheartedly and unashamedly support the “right” of homosexuals to tout their perversity and to have their immorality justified and made "legal" and to be treated as normal, natural, healthy and “moral”. The three, make it four, by their demonstrative actions and positions, if not by their meaningless, empty words are untied in their contempt of the one true God of the universe and Jesus Christ, God-incarnate.

It is very important for the life and welfare of this nation that a true conservative, not a Bush clone or imitation pre-election promised “conservative” iike McCain, Romney or Giuliani are pretending to be, but a true principled conservative. Someone like Representative Duncan Hunter or Governor Mike Huckabee or Representative Tom Tancredo must grab the nomination from the main-stream media – establishment choice.

The voters, no America herself, must be given a clear alternative in 2008:

>>> Life (sanctify of personhood of human beings from conception through natural death) versus Death (abortion atrocity and euthanasia)

>>> Pro-family (one-man-one-woman marriage) versus Neo-“family” units (same sex and every other assorted antithesis of the natural family)

>>> American traditional values (adherence to the declaration, the constitution) versus Socialist-Humanist-Globalist values (atheism, communism, New Age religion)

>>> Willingness to battle the Islamo-Terrorists and their gumbas and backers and allies, the Communists, versus Unwillingness to do battle, to appease, to surrender and to shirk the responsibility to fight our sworn enemies.

We do not need a lukewarm, Bush-like “moderate” to run against these 2-bit radical leftist. I am afraid that President Bush has disgraced both the Conservative movement and the faith that he claims to be his, Christianity. No, we need a strong conservative voice. We need someone who is totally committed to Conservative principles and the ideals of our Founding Fathers. We need someone who will provide steady unwavering leadership even in the midst of bad press and poor poll numbers. Someone unafraid of doing the right thing at all times.

If we get any Democrat or any of the so-called media-sanctioned first tier Republican conservative fakers to be our next President we will surely be in trouble. The very sovereignty of this nation, the very welfare, the very existence of this nation is at stake.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Should the U.S. Fund “Moderate” Terrorism?

The U.S. is engaged in several attempts to arm various groups around the world as they are fighting against extremists and terrorists. But are these groups themselves terrorists?

It is well known that President Bush wants to establish a Palestinian state. The U.S. is giving them $190 million in aid to do this. The U.S. is arming the Palestinian group Fatah as they are fighting against the more radical, but popularly elected Hamas. They have taken over the Gaza Strip, and the Bush wants Fatah to control the West Bank. But will the weapons that we are giving them end up being pointed at the United States? King George wants to “spread democracy”, but only when the elected are to his liking.

The U.S. is now engaged in arming Sunnis in Iraq, even some former Bathists (ones who were loyal to Saddam Hussein). The hope is that they will use these weapons to fight against Al Qaeda. These were the very people who President Bush said were evil and were in cahoots with Al Qaeda and must be overthrown for the safety of the United States. Now he is saying we must help them defeat Al Qaeda. Is this wacky or what? Some of the dollars we are pouring into Iraq are bound to end up in hands of the insurgents.

The U.S. has given aid to Pakistan in order to seek out and kill Al Qaeda members who have crossed the border from Afghanistan. Remember that the justification for overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan was that they refused to hand over Osama Bin Laden. He has not been caught, despite the fact that Pakistani President Musharaf has said, “we have done our part”. Not only has Musharaf been complacent about this, he has made treaties with Taliban factions and has created a “safe zone” (no Pakistani police or military presence) for terrorists in Pakistan along the Afghanistan border. Musharaf will not even allow U.S. forces to come into that region and deliver justice to these murderous terrorists. Remember that President Bush once said, “We will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them.” The case for war against Pakistan is now equal to that of the case for war against Afghanistan and far greater than the case for war in Iraq ever was, and yet President Bush still wants to give Pakistan aid.

The Mujahadeen fighters (which included Osama Bin Laden) that were armed by both the Carter and Reagan administrations against the Soviet Union became the Al Qaeda of today. The establishment of the Taliban government was also funded by the United States under the Clinton administration. Bush claimed that he was against such “nation building” when he first campaigned for president in 2000, but unfortunately, he discarded this promise soon after he was elected.

The other Islamic madman that the world has focused its attention on in is this Mahmoud Amedinajad. (I think that the mullahs have the real power in Iran, but this is moot point—they are all of the same ilk.) I don’t know that the U.S. is funding Iran now, but it did help Iran at one time. Remember the Iran-Contra scandal?

I have only mentioned the funding of Islamic groups in this article only because that’s where everyone’s attention is these days. Don’t think that I don’t know that they have not cornered the market on terrorism. Both republicans and democrats alike have funded and/or aided countless other thugs, dictators, and bloody revolutionaries who were worse than those they overthrew.

Is “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” really a good policy? Have we really learned the lessons of September 11th?

Psalm 118:8, 9 says, “It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man. It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes.”

Psalm 146:3 says, “Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.”

Isaiah 31:1-3 says, “Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because they are many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the LORD! Yet he also is wise, and will bring evil, and will not call back his words: but will arise against the house of the evildoers, and against the help of them that work iniquity. Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When the LORD shall stretch out his hand, both he that helpeth shall fall, and he that is holpen shall fall down, and they shall fail together.”

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

CAIR & PC Want to Deep 6 You and Me

CAIR's Esteemed "Al umni"

Organizations like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) (pronounced “they-really couldn’t-CARE-less about America”) uses America’s growing political correctness-run-amok environment against her. In an email I just received from Gary Bauer he noted that conservative commentator Cal Thomas recently got into trouble with CAIR for daring to ask in the aftermath of the London and Glasgow bombings, “How much longer should we allow people from certain lands, with certain beliefs to come to Britain and America and build their mosques, teach hate, and plot to kill us?” Bauer says, “It is a legitimate question as there may be an American connection to those attacks.”

The outrageous CAIR organization represents the interests of radical and foreign Muslims not American ideals. CAIR and the Democrat Party elite form an axis of evil against everything positive that President Bush is trying to do in the War on Terror in Iraq and elsewhere to stem the advance of Islamic terrorism, which is really basic Islam. I strongly disagree with President Bush’s assessment that Islam is a religion of peace. Far from it, it is the opposite. Just look at what the radical Muslims in any Islamic majority country or area of a country, do to true Christians and especially to converts from Islam. They peacefully behead them, gently rape them, tenderly torture them and/or otherwise cause sweet sundry grief to be borne on them.

Bauer further relates that NBC24, a television station in Toledo, Ohio is reporting that on July 4th FBI agents questioned a Muslim doctor, Mohammad Anvari-Hamedani, who recently moved to the United States from Great Britain. Bauer writes, “The news report also noted that an email has been sent throughout the Toledo Muslim community warning that the FBI’s questioning “revolved around his praying at a particular Mosque in Toledo,” and that Muslims should be prepared for similar questioning by the FBI. It’s worth noting that there is a history of Islamic radicalism in Toledo.

“Last year, the government froze the assets of a Toledo-based group called “KindHearts for Charitable Human Development” for its connections to Hamas. KindHearts was once one of the largest Muslim charities in America, reportedly collecting as much as $4 million a year to provide medical assistance to Palestinian refugees. So here we have a terrorist plot in Great Britain involving Muslim doctors turned homicide bombers and the FBI is questioning a Muslim doctor from Great Britain who moved to an American community with ties to terrorist fundraising under the guise of providing medical assistance. Now, there could be absolutely nothing wrong here, but at least the FBI seems to be pro-actively “connecting the dots.” Good for them. Now if only our politicians would answer Cal Thomas’ question!”

See also an article titled, “UK al Qaeda bomb plot investigation extends to … Toledo, Ohio.”


Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Property Rights Attacked

The following article is ‘hot off the press.’ The article is reprinted from The Eagle, the Quarterly Newsletter of the Eagle Forum in Ohio, Volume 9, Issue 3. Eminent domain has "evolved" to now mean that the government can (mis)appropriate private property and sell it to another private party. The purpose of this scam is to boost the revenue of a city or other government entity.

Ohio Eminent Domain Bill Passes

"Ohio Senate Bill 7, an eminent domain reform act, was signed into law on July 10. Some municipal officials have said that S.B. 7 makes it too difficult for cities to acquire land by eminent domain. Others, like Steven Anderson of the Castle Coalition, believe that the new law does not go far enough to protect private property from government takeover: “Unfortunately, so many real protections for homeowners and property owners were whittled away during legislative wrangling that the bill changes very little for Ohioans and makes this legislation one of the wakest reform measures in the nation.” A project of the Institute for Justice, the Castle Coalition (www.castlecoalition.org) is a citizen groups that tracks and fights eminent domain abuse.

"The debate over the proper use of eminent domain has intensified since the U.S. Supreme Court, in Kelo v. City of New London (2005), ruled tat government entities could take private property for the purpose of increasing tax revenue or jobs. About forty states have responded with new regulations that increase property rights protection. Last year the Ohio Supreme Court, in Norwood v. Horney, rejected the abuse of eminent domain by a Cincinnati suburb. The court called the right to keep and own property a “fundamental right” That is an “integral aspect of our theory of democracy and notions of liberty.”

"The original (Senate) version of S.B. 7 was actually a very strong piece of legislation, but the House watered down the bill. S.B. 7’s original language would have prevented most of the abuse of eminent domain. The bill required 90% of the properties in an area to be blighted before eminent domain could take place, and the definition of “blight” used very objective criteria. The weakened House language, however, reduced the percentage of blighted property to 70%, and (according to Anderson) the criteria for blight are “so vague and amorphous that they can literally apply anywhere” Anderson says that the bill’s broad definition of blight makes it an extremely easy standard to meet.”

"In short, it appears that strong restrictions on eminent domain are still lacking in our state. Anderson says “Ohioans must demand reform until all property in the state is protected.”"

Monday, July 16, 2007

Senator Kennedy Schemes to Pass “Hate Crimes” Law

Aaron McKinney & Russell Henderson, Matthew Shepard's killers

The following is the content of a letter I just emailed to my two U.S. Senators and to President George W. Bush.

I am appalled by the fact that Senators Edward Kennedy and Gordon Smith are, in essence, exploiting American soldiers who are in harm’s way by trying to force passage of pro-homosexual hate crimes language into law (SA 2067 to the Defense Reauthorization Bill HR 1585.). I urge you to REJECT any version of the National Defense Authorization Act IF -- as Senator Kennedy has proposed -- it contains language adding "sexual orientation" to federal "hate crimes" categories.

Please do not let Senator Kennedy exploit our military to push the homosexual agenda. The Senate must pass a National Defense Authorization Act that does NOT promote the homosexual agenda.

Senator Kennedy is a living and breathing example of why we need term limits in the Congress. Senator Kennedy, I think, would do just about anything to move his wicked and perverse agenda forward. His agenda includes preserving, protecting and advancing a woman’s "right" to kill her baby at her whim, it includes doing everything possible to legitimatize, protect and promote homosexuality as a healthy, natural, normal alternate life style and to remove all vestiges of God and Jesus Christ from the schools, the public square, government etc.

There is a major question about whether Matthew Shepard, the young man for whom the SB 1105 for the so-called "Hate Crimes" bill was named, was the victim of an actual hate crime. Apparently he may have been the victim of a crime of a person desperate to get money to feed his powerful drug addiction. Matthew Shepard was conveniently used as a victim of “hate crime.” The media picked up the ball and rolled with it, ala Dan Rather. Like the radical followers of Islam our radical left will use lies if it furthers their cause. They have used lies in establishing the “need” for abortion and now they use lies to try to establish homosexuality something other than what it is - deviant behavior.


Please contact your two U.S. Senators and urge them to vote AGAINST approving SA 2067 as an amendment to the Defense Reauthorization Bill (H.R. 1585). Toll free numbers to reach your Senators include 1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call toll 1-202-225-3121.

Time is very short. Please act now!

A real problem-solver!

T.D. sends A Good Choice . . . another ditty that has been circling the vast world of cyberspace. I read a similar version somewhere. It very much bears repeating!

"1, 2, 3 problem solved"

by anonymous

“Everyone concentrates on the problems we're having in this country lately, (such as) illegal immigration, hurricane recovery, wild animals attacking humans in Florida.

“Not me. I concentrate on solutions to problems. The result is a win-win-win situation:

1. Dig a moat the length of the Mexican border.

2. Use the dirt to raise the levies in New Orleans.

3. Put the Florida alligators in the moat.

“Any other problems you would like for me to solve today?”

This sure is a much better solution to the aforementioned problems than any that we are currently getting from our dysfunctional government bureaucrats, Congress and President isn’t it?

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Who is a Real Christian?

Is TV & Radio personality Glenn Beck a Mormon & a Christian?

I recall that on May 10, 2007 while listening to the Glenn Beck Radio Show. I heard Al Sharpton say that he thought Mr. Beck and the Mormons were Christians. I thought, “This is sad.” Al Sharpton had said, “…not to be concerned about Mitt Romney because God would support the real Christians.” To which I thought, “How sweet. That leaves out all those running for the office of President in the Democrat Party.” The only Democrat who might be a Christian is Gov. Richardson. I say this because I know nothing about the man. All the other Democrat candidates by their positions and actions present no evidence that they are true Christians.

Glenn got very angry with Al Sharpton because felt that “Rev.” Sharpton had implied Governor Mitt Romney and the Mormon Church are not Christians. How could anyone not believe Mormons are Christians? Ann Coulter is reported as saying Mitt Romney is as Christians as she is. I am sure that is true. More than likely neither of them are true Christian.

Mormons may proselytize a Christian, who does not know God’s Word (the Bible), and in that way have a confessing Mormon who is a Christian. However, Mormonism fundamentally is not Christian, nor do people become Christian by being Mormon. Glenn Beck told of a position he has in the Mormon Church which if he knew God’s Word he would know his position is bogus. Glen said that he is a priest after the order of Meklchizedek. This priestly position was conferred on him by the Mormon Church.

Melchizedek is a man like unto the Son of God who is without mother or father, without beginning of life or end of days. In order to be a priest after the order of Melchizedek one must have an endless life. What Glen and the Mormon Church contend is that Glenn Beck has an endless life without beginning of life or end of days. In other words, Glenn is God. Anyone knows that this is not true.

Jesus is a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek. He is so by means of an endless or eternal life having been so designated by God the Father. Jesus is God, creator of the universe. I doubt if Glenn has an endless life and will never die nor does God consider him a priest after the order of Melchizedek. This is only one of the false beliefs of the Mormon Church.

Mormons also teach that the family is forever. This is not true. “Family” exists only for as long as both man and woman shall live. Jesus says there is no marrying or giving in marriage for those who attain to the resurrection. A woman had married seven brothers one at a time in order to raise children to the oldest brother. Finally the woman died. The question asked of Jesus was, “Whose wife would she be in the resurrection?” Jesus said there is no marrying or giving in marriage in the resurrection. The family relationship ends and the people are as the angels in that they won’t marry or have children in resurrection of the righteous. Mormons teach that each family will be able to populate a whole world for themselves. This of course is not true.

Sadly, Mormons teach that one is made right with God by the works of righteousness done within the Mormon Church. Unfortunately this is not true and the Mormons are lost and not Christian. They are going to perdition (hell and the second death, the Lake of Fire.)

To determine who is truly a Christian one must look at the Word of God and see what it says and then look at a person’s life, conduct, and speech to see if they line up with the truth of God’s Word. Most conservative talk show hosts all claim to be Christians. At least those talk show hosts to whom I listen - Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bill Bennett, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Laura Ingram and Michael Reagan - make that claim.

Of the conservative talk show host listed above only Michael Reagan appears to be a genuine Christian. Bill Bennett is close for I heard him say that one is not a Christian by their good works but by faith. This of course is correct as Martin Luther said, “Faith Alone.” I question whether Bill Bennett has applied this to himself by repenting of his sins and inviting Jesus into his heart. Rush Limbaugh is close for he said that the consensus of Christians is that by believing in Jesus one gets to heaven. Jesus said no one goes to God the Father but by me. He is the way, the truth, and the life. Whether Rush has appropriated this to himself by repenting of his sin and inviting Jesus into his heart I don’t know. The Sunday school class, which I once attended did not think so. Laura Ingram said of James Dobson that she wasn’t sure about those who determine the Christianity of others when Dobson said Fred Thompson wasn’t a Christian This shows she is not Christian. Sean Hannity seems to think that most everyone is a Christian. His criterion for who is a Christian does not seem to be Scripturally-based.

There is a God; He is self-existent, all-powerful, holy, just, faithful, loving, jealous, all-knowing, good, wise, and concerned about His creation. Not acquitting sinners, yet desiring that no one should perish. Every word He says is important for it is written, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.” God is triune yet one. God is one spirit, which is capable of being everywhere at the same time and indwelling many individuals simultaneously. Those who obey God’s Word live and those who choose to disobey God’s Word die. Adam and Eve both chose to disobey God’s Word and died. Today we are all born dead, separated from God.

God promised Adam and Eve that someone would destroy Satan. That person was Jesus of Nazareth. God in His mercy sent His only begotten Son, Jesus, to do for us what we couldn’t do for ourselves. He lived a sinless life, fulfilled the law and took in His own body the sins of all mankind and received from God His wrath for all people. Then He said it is finished and gave up His spirit at the time of His choosing. Three days later He rose from the dead. For those who ask God’s forgiveness and repent of their sins in the name of Jesus, the Spirit of God comes into their heart (brain) and gives them eternal life.

It is the entering into ones heart by the Spirit of God in the name of Jesus that makes one a Christian. This is the born again experience which is also referred to as being saved. Paul writes that unless you have the Spirit of Christ you ado not belong to Christ. An example was the man who went into the temple and would not so much as look up into heaven but beat upon his chest and prayed, “Lord be merciful to me a sinner.” Jesus said this man went home justified.

How about you? Are you born again? Have you ever invited Jesus into your heart? A sample prayer is: “Lord Jesus Christ please forgive me of my wrongdoing, my evil, my proclivity to sin and please come onto my heart.” To find out more please click here.

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Red China Sells Junk, Executes "Justice"

Michael Ramirez Cartoon from Townhall.com Funnies 7/12/07

China received some very bad press from even the mainstream media (i.e. the very bad press) for its tainted food products, which it apparently routinely ships to and which are peddled in America along with a variety of other cheap Chinese-manufactured junk. Recently it was also reported that other products like radial tires unraveling on the road were being imported and sold here as real tires.
What do you expect when you pay and treat your employees the way the Chinese government does its slave labor? Chinese workers LITERALLY work in slave conditions and slave wages, because many actually ARE slaves, or virtual slaves!

Unbeknownst to most Americans, we - taxpayers and Wal*Mart shoppers - are funding not only the War on Terror, but China's military build up and its support of our enemies - the terrorists. It is time to put an end to the free flow of cheap substandard goods coming from China and our unlimited flushing of our money down the toilet leading to China. We need to support American manufacturers and retailers who sell American goods. Avoid buying Chinese wherever and whenever you can.

And to think this atheistic, communist, social state like Red China is what American radical liberals lead by the likes of Speaker Nancy "the humble and self-proclaimed most powerful woman in the world" Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry "the political hack" Reid, are trying to replicate here in the United States of America. They are actually working through the courts and with their priority bills in Congress to transform our Democratic Republic form of government into a socialist state.

I hope that the majority of Americans will have their eyes opened wide to the reality of what the Pelosi-Reid lead (astray) Congress is trying to do to America. Furthermore, I hope that they see that a Rodham-Clinton Obama ticket would be equally or even more destructive. I would love to see the American voters move as swiftly as the Chinese in executing their wrong-doers such as what they did to their food and drug czar. American voters need to exercise our ability to execute justice by excising Congress of the manufacturers and supporters of socialism and communistic ideals such as Pelosi and Reid and preventing a Rodham-Clinton and/or Obama or an Edwards from an occupation of the White House.

Friday, July 13, 2007

Is this what liberals want? One divided nation under many gods including Satan?

Hinduism and one of its many gods, Ganesha

In response to a thoroughly inappropriate and insulting invitation by Senate Majority Leader Harry “the political hack” Reid to a Hindu priest, I shot off this email last night to my two U.S. Senators:

It was a very unwise, insulting and shameful to invite a Hindu
Chaplain to provide an invocation to open today's Senate session. America was founded as a Christian nation and our very foundations are eroding. This poor judgment on the part of Senator Reid shows his anti-Christian bias.

We are One Nation under God, not one nation under many gods. We must stop this foolish political correctness and so-called tolerance and diversity. The Senate apparently opens its arms and embraces every philosophy and religion except true Christianity. Will you next invite someone from the Church of Scientology or a Wicca to open the Senate with prayer?

Has America really drifted so far from the Founding Fathers vision and intent that she can no longer be called “One Nation under God,” but more appropriately by the title of this article? For the past fifty or so years America has actually regressed, not progressed in terms of our founders’ blueprint for this nation. Now, thanks to Senator Harry “the political hack” Reid we have stepped back another step. This Democrat elitist invited a fellow Nevadan and a chaplain with the Indian (Eastern Asia) Association of Northern Nevada, Rajan Zed. Zed is actually a Hindu priest.

There is nothing necessarily unconstitutional about the Hindu’s prayer. However, it is an affront to all believers of monotheistic religions, to America and to Americans to even invite such a religious leader to give an invocation. Like I said it is Senator Harry “the political hack” Reid’s prerogative to invite whom he wishes and once invited the Hindu priest has every right to pray in whatever fashion he wished to his gods. .

One the other hand, because our country has always recognized and honored, until fairly recently, the one true God of the Judeo-Christian Scripture. Senator Reid did a foolish and insulting thing inviting a non-monotheistic representative to pray over our Christian nation’s leaders and representatives.

OneNewsNow.com reported today that Pierre Bynum, chaplain of the Family Research Council, called yesterday's historic Hindu prayer to open the U.S. Senate “just one more step away" from America's Christian heritage. He says, “the founders of the United States would never have wanted a pantheistic prayer to open that legislative body. .. ." Bynum also said that “the farther America gets away from the faith of its founding fathers, the more troubled and confused the country will become.

Listen to the words not befitting the America of our Forefathers uttered by the Hindu cleric: "Let us pray. We meditate on the transcendental glory of the deity supreme who is inside the heart of the Earth, inside the life of the sky, and inside the soul of the heaven." Just the opening words of the prayer were antithetical to all that our Forefathers worked and established for us. New age gobble gook if you ask me.

All that can be said is, “Shame on you Senator Reid for inviting such ungodly prayers to be spoken before America’s Senate.” I surely hope that you will go the way of Tom Daschle in 2010 when it is time for you to give an accounting of your work to your constituents. You are so deserving of being fired for your treasonous acts regarding the war on terror, your rigid stance on abortion and so-called homosexual “rights” and your anti-Christian bias and hatred.