This is series of
articles designed to help professing Christians to turn from their wicked ways
and get back to following New Testament ethics.
Compromise is increasing in the church.
Popular opinion among churchgoers is often in stark contrast to the very
words of Jesus on many issues.
Christians need to know the word of God and get back to using it as a
reference book when they are faced with important decisions.
If the preacher says these things and “until death due you part” or anything like this and if you say “I do”, but you don’t really believe it, then you are a liar.
I also mentioned last week that I was going to talk about
another reason why there are so many divorces.
When we have a society where it is normal even within the church to have
people getting divorced and to have RADs, then people aren’t ashamed of it
anymore. It’s like as if people don’t
really get married anymore. If things
don’t work out, you can always marry somebody else. So what’s the point in getting married
then? If you go along with what seems to
be the mainstream, you may as well just be living with someone instead of
getting married. In fact, it would
actually be better because, as I showed above, it is dishonest to say “I do”
when you don’t really believe what you are agreeing to. And if you get divorced, then you are
breaking your promise. If you have a RAD
then you are breaking your promise even more.
(Don’t get me wrong, cohabitation is definitely sin.) But if people believe what the Bible says
about RAD and if it were taboo to disobey it as it should, then they will be
less likely to marry the wrong person and much less likely to get a
divorce.
But don’t listen to my arguments--read what God says in the
Bible:
Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9, Mark 10:12, Luke 16:18, Romans
7:2-3 and I Corinthians 7:10-11, 39.
These passages can summarized as follows:
1. RAD is sin. It is
the moral equivalent of adultery.
2. There is only one exception given in the Bible. A divorced man can remarry without sinning only if the reason for the
divorce was his wife’s fornication
(i.e. it must be a sin of a sexual nature--the NIV incorrectly translates that
word as “marital unfaithfulness”).
That is mostly all you need to know. But there are a few loose ends that, Lord
willing, I will tie up in the coming weeks about this issue. These include some minor and common sense
clarifications, a defense against claims that there are additional exceptions, ways
that the Scriptures concerning RAD might be used legalistically, and finally my
own testimony concerning RAD.
Click here to read the article in this sub-series.
Click here to read the article in this sub-series.
No comments:
Post a Comment