This is series of
articles designed to help professing Christians to turn from their wicked ways
and get back to following New Testament ethics.
Compromise is increasing in the church.
Popular opinion among churchgoers is often in stark contrast to the very
words of Jesus on many issues.
Christians need to know the word of God and get back to using it as a
reference book when they are faced with important decisions.
RAD
is my acronym for remarriage after divorce. Last week I started a sub-series on this
topic. In review I wrote:
1. RAD is sin. It is
the moral equivalent of adultery.
2. There is only one exception given in the Bible. A divorced man can remarry without sinning only if the reason for the
divorce was his wife’s fornication
(i.e. it must be a sin of a sexual nature--the NIV incorrectly translates that
word as “marital unfaithfulness”).
These are the scriptures which form the basis for this
teaching:
Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9, Mark 10:12, Luke 16:18, Romans
7:2-3 and I Corinthians 7:10-11, 39.
Now for some very minor and common sense clarifications:
1. If you were divorced, you can become reunited with your
former spouse as long as neither of you married someone else since the
divorce occurred (Deuteronomy 24:4).
This does not count as RAD, but it is a reconciliation of an existent
marriage commitment. Some of the
passages above make this point very clear (especially I Corinthians
7:11).
2. If someone has already committed the sin of RAD, that marriage
is still a real marriage in the eyes of God.
Therefore, such a person should remain
in the same marital state that he or she is currently in. RAD is a sin, but you can’t undo it. If you go back to the one who you first
married (especially if you are a woman) you have only compounded your sin even
more (Deuteronomy 24:4).
3. There are no
exceptions for cases where the divorce was caused by physical abuse,
alcoholism, or any form of immorality except as mentioned in Matthew 19:9
(KJV). It doesn't matter whose “fault”
the divorce was, who left whom, how much time has passed since the divorce,
whether the ex-spouse has married someone else since, whether the divorcee
became a Christian before or after the marriage, or whether the divorcee became
a Christian before or after the divorce.
None of these things are in the Bible.
Just because there may be justifiable reasons for a divorce, that doesn't mean that a RAD isn't a sin in that case. Again, Matthew 19:9 has the only exception.
4. If you reverse the
genders in Matthew 19:9, the statement is no longer necessarily true. It only permits a divorced man to remarry in
this special case. There are no
exceptions at all for divorced women.
5. Deuteronomy 24:2
says, “And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man's wife.” But this does not mean that RAD is not a
sin. Jesus explains why the Law of Moses
was permissive of something that God hates (Matthew 19:4-9).
6. The Greek word
used in Matthew 19:9 to describe the exceptional case is pornea which means fornication.
Translations which use the word “immorality” or “marital unfaithfulness”
should not be taken as license to RAD in cases where the wife has committed
some sin other than a sexual sin. The
Greek word is slightly broader than the word for adultery, so it might include things like
flirting, pornography, and other sinful, sexual behaviors that fall short of
full blown adultery. But I do not
include sexual deprivation in the definition of fornication.
7. Some people believe that the exception mentioned in
Matthew 19:9 is talking about when a woman claims to be a virgin, but upon
marrying the woman, the husband finds that this is not true and divorces her as
a result. I would consider the woman’s
actions to be fornication and thus if the man remarried, it would be included
in the exception to the rule that RAD is sin.
But this is not all that Matthew 19:9 covers. If a woman commits adultery after her wedding
and before the divorce, this also makes it acceptable for her husband to divorce her and to marry
another woman.
From these passages I conclude that the promiscuous are married in God’s eyes. Therefore if such were to marry anyone else other than the one with whom the promiscuity occurred, this is also sin. The New Testament teaches that whatever is considered fornication is sin in Acts 15:29 and 21:25. These passages are talking about how the Gentiles are not to be required to obey the Law of Moses, but fornication is mentioned as an exception. Therefore one can conclude that any sexual behavior that was not permitted in under the Law, is also to be considered sinful for New Testament Christians. The Law of Moses is generally more strict than New Testament ethics, but on the issue of fornication it is more permissive.
Click here to read the next article in this sub-series.
No comments:
Post a Comment