Friday, March 21, 2008

Global Warming: Hoax, Hype & Hidden Agenda, Part I


Earlier this month 500 people attended the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change in New York City. The conference was virtually ignored by the biased main stream media and the cadre of global warming alarmists. The attendees were not ordinary citizens. They were some very well respected (many retired) scientists, researchers, academicians, policy makers and business people.
.
The purpose of the conference was to contest the notion put forth by the main stream media and academia that the global warming debate is over. It also was intended to contest the apparent mandate of the global warming alarmists that drastic measures must be undertaken immediately to avoid global catastrophe, end of discussion.

After an intense 2-day conference with 100 presentations one of the chief results of the conference was the following declaration. I have added bold lettering for emphasis. If you don’t read anything else read the words in bold to garner the gist of the insightful declaration. Tomorrow in part 2 I will make some additional comments.

The Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change

Global warming is not a global crisis

We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;

Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed consensus among climate experts are false;
.
Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing, human suffering;
.
Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:
.
Hereby declare:
.
That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity’s real and serious problems.

THAT THERE IS NO CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT CO2 EMISSIONS FROM MODERN INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY HAS IN THE PAST, IS NOW, OR WILL IN THE FUTURE CAUSE CATASTROPHIC CLIMATE CHANGE.


That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individual citizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.

That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.

That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.

Now, therefore, we recommend – That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as
An Inconvenient Truth.

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

Agreed at New York, 4 March 2008. [End of Declaration]

To be continued


3 comments:

  1. Contrary to popular belief, big corporations do not really oppose unnecessary environmental regulations. They favor these and other types of bad regulations because because the price for them is small to pay for what they get in return--the elimination of their competition. Its harder for small businesses to comply with complicated and unreasonable laws. It is also easier for the big corporations to cheat on the regulations, while the little guy is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for the smallest infraction. Big corporations get their lobbyists to support legislation they never intend to comply with.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Matt -

    Thanks for your comment, I agree with what you said. Global corporations care little about anything but making a profit in any way possible.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous1:18 PM

    The Global Warming Hoax is taking energy and resources away from real threats like the bees dying off because of pesticides and GMO crops from BIG corporations.

    Why is not Goreable and his crew of thieves concerned about the environmental destruction from war?
    Never a word from them on war.

    ReplyDelete