First, Senator
B-Rated (for his inexperience) Barack Obama opened by saying that our “planet is in peril.” Yeah, I would agree with you Senator Obama. It is because of the likes of you and Senator Rodham-Clinton that we are in peril. You push the false global warming theory, which you blame man and the United States. You push evolution as fact rather than the pure fiction that it is. You both put your trust in the corrupt United Nations. You both blindly believe that you can negotiate with our Islam-inspired terrorist enemies. You both have and will continue to contribute to the spending binge causing our deficit to increase. You both want to substantially and continuously increase taxes . . . Yes, you socialist radical liberals are a threat to our planet.Second, I love Hillary Rodham-Clinton’s remark about the 37 million people who are “barely living” above the poverty level without health insurance. My question to you, Senator Rodham-Clinton is, “What about those 50 million murdered babies who are NOT living at all since your precious "right of women to murder their babies in the name of privacy" continues to be a driving force of your life, your sacred cow?
Third, both impressed me on account of their reverent worship of big government as god at the expense of freedoms for Americans. Both will dictate what medical care I can get. When I get it. Where I can get it. How much I can get. Both desire to 'take care' of me.
Fourth, it was hideous that Rodham-Clinton could not and/or would not refer to illegal aliens as anything but UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS. Like Senator McCain she promises to secure the borders. Neither of which have done anything while serving in Congress to make that happen – just the opposite! Why should be expect them to do anything about securing the borders anymore than President Bush has?
Lastly, I heard that the possibility of an Obama – Rodham-Clinton ticket in November would be a “Dream” team or ticket. More like a horrific nightmare if you ask me - a ticket to Hell, maybe!
These two, Rodham-Clinton and Obama, would definitely bring change. Continued change from the America that our Founding Fathers envisioned, a free Democratic Republic protecting the God-ordained rights of its people. They want to CHANGE America into a socialist totalitarian state or utopia managed by the infallible elite like themselves. That is not my idea of positive or welcome CHANGE. Let us change America BACK to our Founders’ original vision and destiny, not a new uncharted destiny known only to a few elites, who know what is best for the proletariat.
It would be illogical to presume that class struggle was not a central theme of the 2008 elections, primed as America was by the rhetoric of Edwards over the last few years and the disparity of income between rich and poor.
ReplyDeleteHow long it takes to cultivate a class struggle may be irrelevant depending upon the nature of the access to funding that permits one to come about. The elections of 2008 provide just such an opportunity driven as it is by international capitalists like Buffet or peers.
In a nation of outsized corporate imperialism and multiculturalism that rewards illegal immigrants, as well as legal immigrants, an inflx of 12 million illegals can exacerbate already festering problems, particularly where those class issues are also mixed with race or ethnic issues.
AS a recipe for disaster, it has all the ingredients required: funding, cast, and opportunity.
It is this nebulous quality of the 2008 election that is anything but the potential of the 1960's in terms of the workforce since the source of jobs has gone overseas, and continues to go overseas.
Given the nature of offshore loans that sustains the government economy, and the undue influence and laxity of government authorities, and there is a real chance of change for the worse, not the better - in the lives of many in the nation who may not be the cause of such disruption, and are not also the cure.
Class struggles are usually targeted at the wealthy, but the wealthy of America represents only about 2% of the population, but have inordinate wealth. It is that wealth class who is funding the political class struggle, and doesn't aim to add jobs, so the question arises of what purpose the struggle if not to ensnare the innocent middle class, already struggling under the same problems as the lower classes?
Disruption for the sake of disruption is not likely to be the objective. That only leaves the takeover of industry, or the takeover of government as options.