Same-Sex "Marriage" Delusion in CA

Party A & Party B

Recently OneNewsNow.com reported that there is a county in California that refused to issue a marriage certificate because the couple placed the words “bride” and “groom” on the marriage license application form. This is one of the ridiculous ramifications of the California Supreme court ruling that redefined marriage to include something beyond a one-man, one-woman relationship. There will be much more horrible ramification if this perversion of the definition of marriage is allowed to stand.

Therefore it is ultimate necessity that Proposition 8 in California be overwhelmingly passed by the people. By voting YES on Proposition 8, they will be telling the radical leftists and socialist who want to undermine the foundational principles and values of America, “No, enough of this foolishness, let’s draw the line in the sand here and now.”

TAKE ACTION

Vote YES, Californians, Support www.ProtectMarriage.com, All Americans.

The American Family Association suggests that concerned citizens everywhere either write a letter or send an email to the Director of the California Department of Health containing content similar to that presented below, which I did today.

Mark B Horton
Director,
California Department of Public Health
PO Box 997410
Sacramento, CA 95899-7410

Dear Dr. Horton:

The California Constitution clearly limits lawmaking power to the Legislature and the voters. This foundational requirement of our democratic process applies now to changing the marriage forms in response to the Court.

Accordingly, I believe the standard marriage application form and processes cannot be changed from a "bride" and a "groom" or a "man" and "woman" without the Legislature first putting a bill on the Governor's desk that he signs.

The authority of California's statutes was clearly understood by your office in 2004 when the City of San Francisco created altered forms which were out of compliance with the marriage statutes governing this process. Even with the Supreme Court's May 15 ruling; only the Legislature can change the statutes which govern those forms.

I find your changing the forms to "Party A" and "Party B" inconsistent with state law. I implore you to leave politics to the politicians and restore the original language to the marriage forms prior to May 15.

Sincerely,