Friday, December 05, 2008

Pravda is to the Right of NYT on Reporting Obama Citizenship Matter




.
Chelsea Schilling had a story ("Pravda raises Obama eligibility issue, Other media outlets begin reporting concerns over president-elect's citizenship status") yesterday on WorldNetDaily.com. regarding the questions swarming aroundthe status of the President-elite Barack Obama’s citizenship. She relates that the stories are beginning to spread over the Internet like wildfire. She wrote that some mainstream media outlets are beginning pick up on the issue. Up to now they have ignored this most important story. Even so-called conservative radio isn’t touching the story. Only bloggers and alternative conservative radio talk shows are looking in depth into the issue. ''

Schilling writes, “Even the Russian online newspaper Pravda featured a column about "the man with no visible past."

“"Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate," the piece by Mark McGrew states. "When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a U.S. citizen."

Schilling continues, “While McGrew acknowledges Obama is praised for his way with words, he warns, "Every con man walking free or in jail is an articulate speaker. Who would give their trust to a man who could not use the right words to convince his targets to trust him? Articulate speaking is no way to judge or rate the integrity of a person."

Even Pravda can see through the false premises and promises of this false prophet. Why couldn’t the 60 million blind sheep see through the lies?

Why is Pravda, which I still think would have Marxist tendencies under Putin's control wants to 'expose' comrade Obama? Could their positions still be to the right of the New York Times or the Los Angeles Times or the Democratic Party? I am puzzled by their position. At the same time I am disquieted by the deafening silence of the atrocious reporting and openly bias the American media has toward the messiah.

2 comments:

Matt said...

Here is another update

gregjaye said...

Matt -

I posted your link in a new article which will be posted tomorrow morning. Thanks for the link.